exciting Boat Ride:

Kyrie · 03-17-2002, 12:05 AM

Hi Viggo,

I donÃ¢??t know, my friend, I still have some doubts.

Even assuming the tree lines show the tug really is on two different sides of the bridge, there is still the question of how the superstructure of the traffic bridge moved from the upstream side of the bridge to the downstream side.

And looking at the height of the barge and cargo of coal versus the clearance between the bridge and the surface of the river, I donÃ¢??t se any way the barge could have made it under the bridge without scraping off the top of the piles of coal. Which assumes the barge was lucky enough not to hit ant bridge pilings as it went under.

IÃ¢??ve seen enough really bizarre things happen to believe what was ostensibly shown could have happened - but I still doubt it really did :-(

Best regards,

Kyrie

Moderator - Cruffler_Forum on Yahoo Groups

"The flame free C&R Forum."

03-17-2002, 12:05 AM	#6
Kyrie User Join Date: Jun 2002 Posts: 757 Thanks: 0 Thanked 212 Times in 101 Posts	Re: exciting Boat Ride: Hi Viggo, I donÃ¢??t know, my friend, I still have some doubts. Even assuming the tree lines show the tug really is on two different sides of the bridge, there is still the question of how the superstructure of the traffic bridge moved from the upstream side of the bridge to the downstream side. And looking at the height of the barge and cargo of coal versus the clearance between the bridge and the surface of the river, I donÃ¢??t se any way the barge could have made it under the bridge without scraping off the top of the piles of coal. Which assumes the barge was lucky enough not to hit ant bridge pilings as it went under. IÃ¢??ve seen enough really bizarre things happen to believe what was ostensibly shown could have happened - but I still doubt it really did :-( Best regards, Kyrie Moderator - Cruffler_Forum on Yahoo Groups "The flame free C&R Forum."