![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#5 | |
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,374
Thanks: 7,447
Thanked 2,613 Times in 1,380 Posts
|
![]()
from: http://www.google.com/appserve/mkt/ApI7UWRj6OCZpd :
Quote:
I'd presume Google makes $ running Google Shopping, and to ban any item limits sales and therefore income. Maybe worry over liability is at the root of it--I'm not convinced that a politically correct payoff is necessarily involved. If it is a payoff, how much will it cost the anonymous "liberal" donor to further control guns by bribing Google to filter its search engine? We have until he saves up that much... And if it is such a conspiracy, how long will they be able to keep it covered up? If it's as good a job as was done for the trips to the moon that nobody really made, then we are in trouble. If Google filters its search engine in the way you propose, you'll see conservatives and liberals alike protesting it because everyone will detect the whole enterprise sliding down the slope, each in his own area of interest. And you'd see a new lease on life for Yahoo because the search engine business, after all, is competitive. eBay won't let us list guns, but they obviously allow accessories and parts to be listed. How long has that been going on--and eBay hasn't slid any farther down its slope. Google is a business, just like any other. If they won't do the job for us, someone else will. Google's loss. I prefer the firearms oriented sites anyway. Notice the difference in the seeming proportions of nincompoops who author the listings--way more people selling something they know nothing about are found on ebay than Gunbroker. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|