upload photo | donate | calendar
|
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
06-16-2012, 06:29 PM
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
Yes, there is more to the story also that I will relate after more have examined it.
Regards, Leon |
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 02:46 AM
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 570
Thanks: 74
Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts
|
"All K dates, without exception, have sharp edged barrel bands. "
Any chance of having a closeup photo of the above please? Thanks. Alf
__________________
I prefer a Luger |
|
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 03:27 AM
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
|
Leon
In addition to the things previously mentiomed, the 8.82 on the barrel should have a comma 8,82 instead of a period. Jan |
|
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 03:38 AM
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
|
Here is a link to a detailed discussion of the K Date:
http://luger.gunboards.com/showthrea...r-Data-Request Jan |
|
|
|
|
06-17-2012, 06:09 AM
|
#5 | |
|
User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Plano, Texas
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 2 Posts
|
Quote:
Yes, I have some text comments under some of the pictures. I did mention that. It's strange that with all the work that was put into that pistol, they would miss using a comma. In particular, notice the style of the E/655 that is the barrel inspection stamp at 10 o'clock just in front of the receiver. Regards, Leon |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
