![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,040
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,257 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
![]()
This is probably a really stupid question, but perhaps did the barrel come from a long receiver gun?
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southeast Texas Swamp
Posts: 2,460
Thanks: 2
Thanked 166 Times in 65 Posts
|
![]()
GT,
I have run into this problem a few times, sometimes it was so close that a little extra "elbow grease" tightened it on up, but left a gouge mark on the end of the bbl. On the others, it was necessary to file a little metal off the end of the bbl to give clearance. Be sure to check headspace after removing any metal from the end of the bbl. But you are doing this anyway after installing a bbl aren't you?
__________________
TRUMP FOR PREZ IN '20! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,528
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 3,711 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
![]()
Hi Ron, nope, all short shank outfits, and parts.. I measured from the rear toggle pin to the front of the receiver face,and compared it with another perfect condition stripped receiver, and it's to within .0015" of the other...I think all that's different is the relief clearance at the barrel base of the internal rail slots on the receiver ... ?? I can only see shaving the back of the barrel a few thou to make it fit correctly.... More mesurements to follow tomorrow... I'll know a'lot more when I'm done....Best to all, til...latr...GT....
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,528
Thanks: 1,334
Thanked 3,711 Times in 1,014 Posts
|
![]()
Hi To all, and Hi Hugh! Thanks for you post..... after a few hours with the digital caliper, I found out the following... The barrel I'm using hand tightens up to exactly the same extractor width distance desired by hand on three different receivers... 1920 commercial, 1920/ model 08 commercial navy, and 1917 DWM WW1 receiver... The receiver in question, 1916 navy, measures exactly the same in all regards, within .0015" everywhere... and with the very same barrel, probably 190 to 200 degrees from straight up tight... probably 180 degrees from desired position at hand tight.. So, it apperas thet I'll have to shave the shoulder, shave the barrel breech end, and deepen the chamber / headspace... Sooooo, it apprears a finish reamer, and a "go" and "no go" gauge(s) are in the future purchases or trades list... any of you guys got any spares you're willing to let go... I've got trade bait coming and going all the time!!...
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|