1900 A&E Test gun

CAP Black · 12-28-2009, 01:29 PM

Is there an area on a 1900 test gun that is expected to be not blued or even perhaps white???
A friend was trying to tell me in one certain area that if it was blued it meant that the gun had been re-blued. My gun doesn't appear to me to have been re-blued but it is blue in the area he points out as the area that shouldn't be blued.
Thanks
Jack

Edward Tinker · 12-28-2009, 02:06 PM

Jack, how about telling us the area?

If you mean under the safety, then yes, your friend is right.

ed

Tomathvl · 12-28-2009, 02:41 PM

I believe the interior should be in the white.

CAP Black · 12-28-2009, 03:11 PM

White from what source? How can a gray metal surface be white? Not trying to be smart-just uninformed.
My but you guys are good with the answers.
Here are pics. Can any better advice be given.
These pics were presented about a year ago.
Thanks
Jack

Norme · 12-28-2009, 03:26 PM

Hi Jack, The term "in the white" means unfinished. Regards, Norm

Tomathvl · 12-28-2009, 03:39 PM

Disassemble the gun and the interior should be in the white i.e. unfinished.

alvin · 12-28-2009, 04:34 PM

Just look externally, .... white area?

How about the muzzle. The muzzle crown is NOT supposed being blued.

alvin · 12-28-2009, 06:43 PM

If the blue on muzzle is cold blue, I would think it's OK. Have more close-up? including the area under the thumb safety level? That area is supposed being "white" as well. It looks pretty dark on the pix.... dark patina or blued? Blued under safety is not good news.

CAP Black · 12-31-2009, 10:21 AM

It appears that the unusual bluing, etc. might relate to the fact that the gun (which several people on lugerforum.com concluded last year was an authentic test gun) was re-worked at some time because of the fact that it has as set of numbered parts which are different including the grips but they are matching unto themselves. And that at the time that work was done some other minor things were done, too. The inside all looks good and no signs of bluing in there. Apparently some of the test guns group have a small set of parts which are similar to mine as that they are a set unto themselves. That's the best that we can determine at this point.
Thanks so much.
Jack

12-28-2009, 01:29 PM	#1
CAP Black User Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Fairmont, WV Right here in Mountaineer country and God's country Posts: 767 Thanks: 100 Thanked 174 Times in 96 Posts	1900 A&E Test gun Is there an area on a 1900 test gun that is expected to be not blued or even perhaps white??? A friend was trying to tell me in one certain area that if it was blued it meant that the gun had been re-blued. My gun doesn't appear to me to have been re-blued but it is blue in the area he points out as the area that shouldn't be blued. Thanks Jack

12-28-2009, 02:06 PM	#2
Edward Tinker Super Moderator Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North of Spokane, WA Posts: 15,966 Thanks: 2,066 Thanked 4,595 Times in 2,116 Posts	Jack, how about telling us the area? If you mean under the safety, then yes, your friend is right. ed __________________ Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

12-28-2009, 03:11 PM	#4
CAP Black User Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Fairmont, WV Right here in Mountaineer country and God's country Posts: 767 Thanks: 100 Thanked 174 Times in 96 Posts	White from what source? How can a gray metal surface be white? Not trying to be smart-just uninformed. My but you guys are good with the answers. Here are pics. Can any better advice be given. These pics were presented about a year ago. Thanks Jack Attached Thumbnails

12-31-2009, 10:21 AM	#9
CAP Black User Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Fairmont, WV Right here in Mountaineer country and God's country Posts: 767 Thanks: 100 Thanked 174 Times in 96 Posts	We looked where told to. It appears that the unusual bluing, etc. might relate to the fact that the gun (which several people on lugerforum.com concluded last year was an authentic test gun) was re-worked at some time because of the fact that it has as set of numbered parts which are different including the grips but they are matching unto themselves. And that at the time that work was done some other minor things were done, too. The inside all looks good and no signs of bluing in there. Apparently some of the test guns group have a small set of parts which are similar to mine as that they are a set unto themselves. That's the best that we can determine at this point. Thanks so much. Jack

12-28-2009, 02:41 PM	#3
Tomathvl User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Milan, IN Posts: 363 Thanks: 3 Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts	I believe the interior should be in the white.

12-28-2009, 03:26 PM	#5
Norme Always A Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,417 Thanks: 226 Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts	Hi Jack, The term "in the white" means unfinished. Regards, Norm

12-28-2009, 03:39 PM	#6
Tomathvl User Join Date: May 2004 Location: Milan, IN Posts: 363 Thanks: 3 Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts	Disassemble the gun and the interior should be in the white i.e. unfinished.

12-28-2009, 04:34 PM	#7
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	Just look externally, .... white area? How about the muzzle. The muzzle crown is NOT supposed being blued.

12-28-2009, 06:43 PM	#8
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	If the blue on muzzle is cold blue, I would think it's OK. Have more close-up? including the area under the thumb safety level? That area is supposed being "white" as well. It looks pretty dark on the pix.... dark patina or blued? Blued under safety is not good news.