LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Holster Forum

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 06-14-2009, 03:10 PM   #14
lugerholsterrepair
Moderator
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
lugerholsterrepair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Arizona/Colorado
Posts: 7,775
Thanks: 4,995
Thanked 3,133 Times in 1,439 Posts
Default

Sweet! Cordovan holsters fall into that WHAT? catagory..not black, not brown now who the heck used them according to color? It just prooves there were some loosening of protocol when it came to leather equiptment color.
Since most branches of the German Armed Forces had their own mandates there is apparently no hard & fast rule about color. I suspect there was also a leniency for Officers that Enlisted Soldiers were not allowed.
That being said...we have the fine example shown above of George's cordovan/burgandy holster. It is in an Army configuration, WaA marked as Military accepted in 1939. This MUST have been an accepted color for general issue at this time. It is NOT an Officer private purchase holster.
Does anyone out there have a cordovan holster dated 1940 or later? I know there are plenty of tan ones...

Jerry Burney
__________________
Jerry Burney
11491 S. Guadalupe Drive

Yuma AZ 85367-6182


lugerholsterrepair@earthlink.net

928 342-7583 (CO & AZ) Year Round
719 207-3331 (cell)


"For those who Fight For It, Life has a flavor the protected will never know."
lugerholsterrepair is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com