41- 42 Luger

Lugerdoc · 01-04-2009, 06:10 PM

Alf, I have an unnumbered BPB/code 122 mag available. PM sent. Lugerdoc

A.Mifsin · 01-05-2009, 02:16 AM

Thanks. PM send.
Alf

barr44 · 01-08-2009, 05:49 PM

Alf,
I have a 41/42 that was refinished at sometime in the past. I was wondering if yours has a barrel proof on the upper left rear portion of the barrel? Mine doesn't seem to have that proof, but I believe it is supposed to have it. It seems to have all of the proofs on the right side of the receiver and on the barrel, which are still pretty sharp. The one on my gun may have been polished off , especially if it were fairly faint.
Thanks for any info that you care to share.
barry

A.Mifsin · 01-10-2009, 05:53 AM

Hi Barry, Yes my barrel has two stamps and the the barrel gauge which is 8.81. the stamps are Acceptance stamp E/655 and the Army Test Proof.
Attached photo of stamps, I hope that they are clear enough for you to see.

If you need more info,just ask.

Alf.

barr44 · 01-10-2009, 11:38 AM

Thanks Alf,
Evidently the acceptance stamp on my pistol has been buffed off, although there is some minute trace of it on the left upper rear portion of the barrel. Other than that all of the other markings are strong and correct.
It's a unique variation, so enjoy yours, being all original except for your mag. still makes it a prized possession, I'm sure.
Mine came with a correct mag. of the period, but it doesn't match the serial number of the gun. Sounds like with the help of some of those on the forum, you'll be able to solve that problem easy enough. This is a great group of folks here.
Thanks again, barry

A.Mifsin · 01-10-2009, 02:35 PM

Thanks Barry,
I am glad to say that I found a correct Type3 Army magazine for my luger and I am waiting for it to arrive.

As you said this is a great forum with great members.

Alf.

Hueydriver · 01-10-2009, 03:44 PM

Alf, Very nice luger, Thanks for sharing. Looks like it has nicely figured grips...

Congrats, Jesse

01-04-2009, 06:10 PM	#1
Lugerdoc Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302 Posts: 5,089 Thanks: 6 Thanked 737 Times in 484 Posts	Alf, I have an unnumbered BPB/code 122 mag available. PM sent. Lugerdoc __________________ Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302 Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net

01-05-2009, 02:16 AM	#2
A.Mifsin User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Malta Posts: 570 Thanks: 74 Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts	Thanks. PM send. Alf __________________ I prefer a Luger

01-08-2009, 05:49 PM	#3
barr44 User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: york co., va Posts: 153 Thanks: 27 Thanked 35 Times in 21 Posts	Barrel Proof? Alf, I have a 41/42 that was refinished at sometime in the past. I was wondering if yours has a barrel proof on the upper left rear portion of the barrel? Mine doesn't seem to have that proof, but I believe it is supposed to have it. It seems to have all of the proofs on the right side of the receiver and on the barrel, which are still pretty sharp. The one on my gun may have been polished off , especially if it were fairly faint. Thanks for any info that you care to share. barry

01-10-2009, 05:53 AM	#4
A.Mifsin User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Malta Posts: 570 Thanks: 74 Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts	Hi Barry, Yes my barrel has two stamps and the the barrel gauge which is 8.81. the stamps are Acceptance stamp E/655 and the Army Test Proof. Attached photo of stamps, I hope that they are clear enough for you to see. If you need more info,just ask. Alf. Attached Images __________________ I prefer a Luger

01-10-2009, 11:38 AM	#5
barr44 User Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: york co., va Posts: 153 Thanks: 27 Thanked 35 Times in 21 Posts	Acceptance stamp. Thanks Alf, Evidently the acceptance stamp on my pistol has been buffed off, although there is some minute trace of it on the left upper rear portion of the barrel. Other than that all of the other markings are strong and correct. It's a unique variation, so enjoy yours, being all original except for your mag. still makes it a prized possession, I'm sure. Mine came with a correct mag. of the period, but it doesn't match the serial number of the gun. Sounds like with the help of some of those on the forum, you'll be able to solve that problem easy enough. This is a great group of folks here. Thanks again, barry

01-10-2009, 02:35 PM	#6
A.Mifsin User Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Malta Posts: 570 Thanks: 74 Thanked 12 Times in 12 Posts	Thanks Barry, I am glad to say that I found a correct Type3 Army magazine for my luger and I am waiting for it to arrive. As you said this is a great forum with great members. Alf. __________________ I prefer a Luger

01-10-2009, 03:44 PM	#7
Hueydriver User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: North Dakota Posts: 66 Thanks: 7 Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts	Alf, Very nice luger, Thanks for sharing. Looks like it has nicely figured grips... Congrats, Jesse