![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#11 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
![]()
Ed,
Based on my readings and the more scholarly previous discussions, I believed a "legit" TE holster of the right-side, butt forward design was to have both the stampings in the leather on the back and the inspector initial stampings on the front flap, along its bottom. I noticed Eric's holster did not have the initials on the front flap and so I also asked about what the back may have. The Robert Hamilton discussion centered around the more curious left-side, butt forward holster design. In that discussion, I recalled Ron had made a pretty strong statement about the right-side, butt forward TE holsters and what markings he had seen. That is why I posted up the quotation... BTW...I just looked at two (2) TE holsters that Chuck Whittaker has photos posted of on his Land-o-Borchardt site. They are shown with other holsters in his "Accessories" pull-down tab. http://www.landofborchardt.com/ Front and back photos of the 2 holsters are shown. Both have the back-side stampings as Ron Wood mentions but both appear NOT to have the inspector's initials along the bottom portion of the front closure flap... Both of the TE holsters on Whitttaker's site are the right-side, butt forward type...just like Eric's photo. SOoooo....the issue is quite confusing in my mind...that is, if TE holsters of the right-side, butt forward design should have inspectors initials along the bottom of the front flap or not...???...like this one... ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|