![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: D/FW, Tx
Posts: 279
Thanks: 109
Thanked 31 Times in 16 Posts
|
Hi Joe,
* You may be right judging from your profile interest. I suspect you've handled a good deal more of these than I may have ever payed notice to. * However, I think you can find the number with and without a period after the marking based on the energy/discipline/attention of the individual armorer applying the mark. * For instance, tools appear both ways in J. Still's, Weimar Luger, Pg. 180. Jan's, Imperial Luger, Pg. 87 shows the period after the inventory number; but, shows a full unit number as well. Gortz & Bryan's, GSAM, Pg. 76 depicting the location of markings per the 1924 H.Dv. 464 instructions, shows the period after the number. Take your pick. * I was going w/ the general appearance of Mark's first tool picture wherein the period seems to have been struck contempoary with the numeric portion of the marking. The E/S PROOF appears added at a later time. I think much later than the WWII era, IMHO. * Trust this helps. |
|
|
|
|
|