LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 04-05-2007, 09:33 PM   #4
Jim McArthur
User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Orleans LA
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Legalese

Herb, what the prosecutor actually means is that innocence exists in two realms: "at law", and "in fact".

"In fact" means that "the guy really didn't do it", in objective reality.

"At law" means that he may have in fact done it, he may not have: but he retains the "presumption of innocence", "at law", until such time as the verdict is handed down. At that point his presumption of innocence is no more. "At law", he's then either "guilty", or "not guilty".

"Not guilty" does NOT mean that "we the jury have determined that he didn't in fact commit the crime", merely that "at law, the prosecution has failed to carry its burden of proving to us, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he did in fact commit the crime."

No one is ever "found innocent" or "vindicated" at trial: this is news media nonsense.

Does this make sense?



Jim
Jim McArthur is offline   Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com