Borchardt Magazine

Big Norm · 03-31-2007, 11:30 PM

Hum-m-m

It looks like I opened a can of worms here. My serial #1966 appears to be slightly smaller than Pats large in size number (1774) and my serial #552 seems to be slightly larger than his smaller in size serial number (2173). It does not look like his numbers have been altered either. I am close, but different. I'm sure happy to have Ron Wood sort this one out.

But Pats physical mags look as original as mine does. It looks like I will have to break out that digital camera I got myself for Christmas so that I can do as good a job as Pat did with his camera.

Incidently, my serial numbers go the same direction as Jims.
Big Norm

03-31-2007, 11:30 PM	#9
Big Norm RIP Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: SE Michigan Posts: 1,864 Thanks: 1 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts	Hum-m-m It looks like I opened a can of worms here. My serial #1966 appears to be slightly smaller than Pats large in size number (1774) and my serial #552 seems to be slightly larger than his smaller in size serial number (2173). It does not look like his numbers have been altered either. I am close, but different. I'm sure happy to have Ron Wood sort this one out. But Pats physical mags look as original as mine does. It looks like I will have to break out that digital camera I got myself for Christmas so that I can do as good a job as Pat did with his camera. Incidently, my serial numbers go the same direction as Jims. Big Norm