Question <IMG SRC="/luger/graphics/indifferent.gif" BORDER=0 ALT=":|">

05-19-2001, 08:04 AM

The 1936 date on your receiver and the Imperial Naval proofing certainly don't belong together. I suspect that one or the other is bogus. If Mauser had reworked the Naval receiver for use in 1936, they certainly would have removed the previous proofing. I once had a 1939 like this which was strickly Waffenfabrik USA.

05-19-2001, 08:04 AM	#2
tom h Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Question The 1936 date on your receiver and the Imperial Naval proofing certainly don't belong together. I suspect that one or the other is bogus. If Mauser had reworked the Naval receiver for use in 1936, they certainly would have removed the previous proofing. I once had a 1939 like this which was strickly Waffenfabrik USA.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode