![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
Quote:
Anyway, G.A.C. had at one time or another almost anything that went Bang! I have a picture of him with a Colt Roots revolver during is West Point days. So, that Remington-Beals may very well be legit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
A conversion, yes. The barrel looks shorter too. The auction also mentions it is a converted 'Navy' Remington. I didn't see anything like that in the short time I looked.
Watching the movie made me wonder what happened to the guidon, the pistols/carbines, canteens, etc. Sitting Bull's people must have salvaged anything they could use. It's strange that more hasn't turned up over the years. Some is on display in various museums and collections, but the bulk of the equipment seems to have remained undiscovered... ![]() There is no way I would ever hear about a member of this forum. I don't know any, and none live near me.
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...
Last edited by sheepherder; 06-25-2016 at 10:15 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
Nope. It's got nothing to do with being a conversion. The Remington-Beals was the predecessor of the most recognized Remington Army and Navy models of the 1861 pattern. That loading lever is original and so is the 7,5 barrel, standard for the Navy model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
Mario. here's a Beals conversion you should appreciate...
![]() http://milpas.cc/rifles/ZFiles/Pisto...20Gallery.html http://milpas.cc/rifles/ZFiles/Pisto...REVOLVER..html ![]() I hope those come out...The URL's look funky... ![]() Quote:
http://www.history.com/topics/native...little-bighorn Several members ofGeorge Armstrong Custer's family were also killed at the Battle of the Little Bighorn, including two of his brothers, his brother-in-law and a nephew.
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...
|
|
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post: |
|
|
#5 | |
|
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
Quote:
It's the most complicated conversion I've ever seen. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: South Central Colorado
Posts: 215
Thanks: 45
Thanked 111 Times in 66 Posts
|
Perhaps, as George says, Custer did deserve his fate for: failing to listen to his scouts about the size of the enemy force he was dealing with; dividing his force into three; failing to bring up his two Gatling guns; and generally being a glory hound. But did his men deserve to share this fate?
Also, I have read that while Custer did have several different types of revolvers, he was carrying a pair of English made ones (I forget the name) that day. Bill
__________________
NRA Endowment Life member Proud veteran of the Naval Security Group |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|