LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > General Discussions

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-14-2016, 12:09 PM   #1
Olle
User
 
Olle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,149
Thanks: 159
Thanked 664 Times in 318 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurusu View Post
In this particular case I'd say it detracts from the value some 120%.
They would have to pay me to take that thing out of their hands.
It's really a shame, the Polish version is very well built and would be a great addition to my collection if it was all original. Like I said, I have never seen one offered for sale, so they must be pretty darn rare in original configuration. The only reason I got it was that I don't want to shoot my Russian and Chinese TTs, so when this one showed up for $200 I just couldn't pass. I have to take that safety off though, it jumps to safe position with each and every round you shoot. It's on there to comply with the Saturday Night Special legislation, so it feels good to know that this gun can't be used by criminals.
__________________
Deer Hollow Enterprises, LLC
Gun repair and restoration
Olle is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-14-2016, 03:57 PM   #2
rhuff
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
rhuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 2,737
Thanked 993 Times in 729 Posts
Default

I own a 1944 Colt 1911A1 that is a "lend-lease" gun to England. It has a number of British proof marks on it, including frame, barrel, etc. In this case, it would only be correct if it has these proof marks. It does not have any import markings, as I purchased it before they were required.
rhuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-14-2016, 04:43 PM   #3
Eugen
User
 
Eugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Newburgh,IN
Posts: 796
Thanks: 403
Thanked 639 Times in 338 Posts
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhuff View Post
I own a 1944 Colt 1911A1 that is a "lend-lease" gun to England. It has a number of British proof marks on it, including frame, barrel, etc. In this case, it would only be correct if it has these proof marks. It does not have any import markings, as I purchased it before they were required.
Now that, in my opinion, is a horse of a different color. That might add value given the historical significance.
__________________
“God created war so that Americans would learn geography.”
― Mark Twain
Eugen is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-14-2016, 05:03 PM   #4
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rhuff View Post
I own a 1944 Colt 1911A1 that is a "lend-lease" gun to England. It has a number of British proof marks on it, including frame, barrel, etc. In this case, it would only be correct if it has these proof marks. It does not have any import markings, as I purchased it before they were required.
Your Colt is absolutely correct historically. No way it's value would be affected. And considering what's been happening to handguns in England, it's value will surely increase.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to kurusu for your post:
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com