new MacGar magazine

Lugerdoc · 01-06-2016, 12:37 PM

Sieger et al, I do have several original Mauser Banner marked Parabellum left from my purchase of all the left over Parabellum parts from Interarms, when they went out of business: As new @$100 or lightly used @$75 + $10 insured priority S&H on either. Tom

RAY1946 · 05-14-2016, 10:10 AM

I have several of the Mec-gar magazines. I took my 1971 Mauser Parabellum in 9mm out the other day to shoot. Two of the mags were the nickel finish with the steel follower, the other 2 were nickel finish with the plastic follower. All rounds fed flawlessly thru all four magazines.

The last four mags that I bought had the plastic follower and I was somewhat disappointed to say the least. I am glad I finally fired some rounds with them and my doubts were not justified...............

01-06-2016, 12:37 PM	#1
Lugerdoc Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302 Posts: 5,089 Thanks: 6 Thanked 737 Times in 484 Posts	Sieger et al, I do have several original Mauser Banner marked Parabellum left from my purchase of all the left over Parabellum parts from Interarms, when they went out of business: As new @$100 or lightly used @$75 + $10 insured priority S&H on either. Tom __________________ Tom Heller POB 398 ST.Charles, MO. 63302 Tel 636-447-3006 lugerdoc@charter.net

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

05-14-2016, 10:10 AM	#2
RAY1946 User Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 77 Thanks: 178 Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts	I have several of the Mec-gar magazines. I took my 1971 Mauser Parabellum in 9mm out the other day to shoot. Two of the mags were the nickel finish with the steel follower, the other 2 were nickel finish with the plastic follower. All rounds fed flawlessly thru all four magazines. The last four mags that I bought had the plastic follower and I was somewhat disappointed to say the least. I am glad I finally fired some rounds with them and my doubts were not justified...............