![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
That however makes me think that the upward pressure of the next round in the magazine may be a part on the correct feeding/ejecting cycle. Possibly the drag caused by the following round in the magazine may help delay the rearward movement of the breech (the main spring having very little tension at the beginning of the motion) long enough for the spent case to get well clear away. Could very well be the reason why the 1908 rifle board who deemed the holdopen unnecessary eventually changed their mind. I’m not familiar with the snail magazine, never got the opportunity to examine one, but I’m under the impression that they were problematic from the get go. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,308
Thanks: 2,737
Thanked 993 Times in 729 Posts
|
![]()
GT,
Some years back I purchased a couple of C-Mag drum magazines that were new production. Each of them came with a tube of graphite powder to use to lubricate the mechanism(springs and follower). I just wonder it that could help your situation out? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|