![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
Quote:
I thought everyone knew that taking an auto pistol apart was part of the graduation test for idiots. If they can re-assemble it, they fail. ![]() I find "they" usually use a Luger or a M1896 Mauser. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
My Standard Catalog of Smith & Wesson shows my serial being in the first year of production [1961] and it still retains the double-action lockout screw. The 52-2 did away with that.
The whole pistol is just a reworked model 39. Much of it was unchanged [design-wise]. I suppose this was S&W's answer to Colt's out-of-the-box competition Gold Cup National Match pistol for big bore shooting. S&W had no experience [at that time] with big-bore autos so based it on their successful 9mm design. ![]() Quote:
The Model 52 has a solid bushing too (a threaded screw-in bushing with a spring plunger lock). I would prefer a collet but I think my style of wildly waving two-hand hold wouldn't improve much... ![]() Quote:
![]() Judging by the prices for brass at www.onlinemetals.com, I have $100 of brass in these two hammers...
__________________
I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...
|
||
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|