![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,917 Times in 1,193 Posts
|
I agree. To me ALL these guns are collectible. Some are just more desirable, due to the purity of their pedigree, (I.E. most closely resembling factory new).
Something similar occurs with Colt 1911s and SAAs. A Colt 1911 that has original finish and features is more desirable than one which has been parked and has A1 upgrades, but they are both still collectible and priced accordingly. An original 7.5" US marked SAA is more desirable than a US marked Artillery SAA, yet both are collectible and priced accordingly. They are all history. |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to alanint for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 706
Thanks: 1,026
Thanked 409 Times in 225 Posts
|
Alainint,
"I agree. To me ALL these guns are collectible. Some are just more desirable, due to the purity of their pedigree, (I.E. most closely resembling factory new). " Thank you, thank you, thank you, I agree completely, I believe the terminology "collector" and "Shooter" is a little misleading but still useful in distinguishing a pistol that has not been changed except through normal wear and tear as it left the factory as opposed to one that may have been repaired, reconditioned or had replacement parts added, but I believe they are all still very collectible. Lon |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 31
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
|
Personally, I do not like import marks and will pass on a Luger with them. Of course, there are other opinions about this and I respect that.
It is permissible to place import marks unobtrusively in the magazine well of a Luger-- making them VERY HARD TO SEE! This is o.k. with the ATF, and I wish more importers would use it |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|