another listing for analysis

DavidJayUden · 07-19-2011, 12:47 AM

I think you are being too hard on the gun. I agree that the mag is garbage but the gun is mostly suffering from way over exposed photography. Less bleached out photos would improve the look considerably. I think the blueing is mostly there.

I'm not trying to be hard on the gun at all. It just seems to me that a .30 Commercial just pales in collectability and investment value up next to a fine WW1 service pistol. The difference in price could be the best money ever spent.
Again, just MHO.
dju

DaveinTN · 07-19-2011, 02:15 AM

Maybe it's the camera angle, but I don't see a lug to attach a stock.

sheepherder · 07-19-2011, 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaveinTN

Maybe it's the camera angle, but I don't see a lug to attach a stock.

+ 1

POS is the correct assessment...

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

07-19-2011, 12:47 AM	#1
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	I think you are being too hard on the gun. I agree that the mag is garbage but the gun is mostly suffering from way over exposed photography. Less bleached out photos would improve the look considerably. I think the blueing is mostly there. I'm not trying to be hard on the gun at all. It just seems to me that a .30 Commercial just pales in collectability and investment value up next to a fine WW1 service pistol. The difference in price could be the best money ever spent. Again, just MHO. dju

07-19-2011, 02:15 AM	#2
DaveinTN User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Tennessee Posts: 186 Thanks: 3 Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts	Maybe it's the camera angle, but I don't see a lug to attach a stock.