Beretta 1935 - another new love!

Steinar · 10-28-2010, 09:46 AM

Click image for larger version

Name: 27102010240.jpg
Views: 149
Size: 54.7 KB
ID: 15442

An interesting thing to notice, is that yours Mr Cartwright (I'm a big fan of Bonanza btw

) does not have a Roman numeral behind the production year 1944. This is because this figure indicates the year of Fascism. Above you see a 1939 XVII(17) while Antonios is 1941 XIX(19). If you count back, you seee that it started in 1922.

I have just handeled one of these Berettas, is it common that the slide is a bit stiff to pull back?

10-28-2010, 09:46 AM	#15
Steinar User Join Date: May 2004 Posts: 1,538 Thanks: 18 Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts	An interesting thing to notice, is that yours Mr Cartwright (I'm a big fan of Bonanza btw ) does not have a Roman numeral behind the production year 1944. This is because this figure indicates the year of Fascism. Above you see a 1939 XVII(17) while Antonios is 1941 XIX(19). If you count back, you seee that it started in 1922. I have just handeled one of these Berettas, is it common that the slide is a bit stiff to pull back? __________________ Previously known as Morgan Kane

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode