LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Repairs, Restoration & Refinishing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-21-2009, 11:45 AM   #1
Neil Young
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Neil Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scottsboro, Alabama
Posts: 552
Thanks: 567
Thanked 449 Times in 170 Posts
Default

Maybe this would be a good project to request data from others who are proficient with micrometers, or at least have micrometers--it's not that hard to do. You could then build a data base and perhaps key the measurements to particular variations. We all don't have the drawings, so if you can, post a drawing showing exactly where to measure. Interested?
__________________
Neil The hurrier I go the behinder I get. Sometimes it takes me all day to get nothing done.
Neil Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-21-2009, 08:16 PM   #2
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lnstumpy@msn.com View Post
We all don't have the drawings, so if you can, post a drawing showing exactly where to measure.
How 'bout a pic showing where I measured???

"A" is the measurements in post # 12 above...

"B" are these measurements, taken from the barrel hood to the bottom of the receiver lug...

comm, 86434: "A"--.872"; "B"--0.966"
1937, 3649: "A"--.885; "B"--.976" [S/42]
comm, 6782n: "A"--.878"; "B"--.972"
Finn?, 77z: "A"--.873"; "B"--.965"
1917, 8514: "A"--.874"; "B"--.970"

This is a better area of measurement; I believe the lug is held to higher tolerances than that area under the hood...

...And the "B" variance from least to most is only .011"...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hood.jpg (20.2 KB, 751 views)

Last edited by sheepherder; 11-22-2009 at 10:13 PM.
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-21-2009, 08:18 PM   #3
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

I used a Starrett dial verniers for this little test...here's pic of my measuring...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hoodmeas.jpg (37.1 KB, 770 views)
File Type: jpg lugmeas.jpg (39.0 KB, 761 views)
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-21-2009, 08:26 PM   #4
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

I have several 1" micrometers (well, who doesn't? ) but I prefer the dial verniers...they're easier to use...

If anyone is going to make up a database for these measurements, I'll do a better job with my 5...Serial # link to measurements at least...and measure 5 times & take the average...

Now...Why would anyone grind anything off the chamber hood??? I thought the idea of faking was to *add* characters to the receiver...crossed rifle, skull & bones, any date to a commercial...

What would you grind off??? A year date??? Why???

I don't think whipping out a mic at a gun show and measuring a Luger is a good idea...It's sure to get ugly...and will draw a crowd like blood draws sharks...Even if the guy you're talking to is agreeable, the guy two tables over with a boosted Luger will complain about it...

Last edited by sheepherder; 11-21-2009 at 08:31 PM. Reason: wrong icon
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-22-2009, 07:39 PM   #5
Neil Young
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Neil Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scottsboro, Alabama
Posts: 552
Thanks: 567
Thanked 449 Times in 170 Posts
Default

Gentlemen:
My measurements are as follows:

"G" date, 7158a: "A"--0.875"; "B"--0.969".

BYF42, 3732f: "A"--0.871"; "B"--0.968".

Neil Young
__________________
Neil The hurrier I go the behinder I get. Sometimes it takes me all day to get nothing done.
Neil Young is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-22-2009, 10:27 PM   #6
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
Default

OK: I went back and re-measured all five of mine...This time I made sure I was *not* measuring across a date, or a number on the lug, or across a dent or ding...and I got several different measurements...so the letters/numbers and any dings or dents will affect the accuracy of the measurements...

I also made sure I was as close as perpendicular to the horizontal plane as possible...I noticed that if I went just a bit off 90º that the measurement would change...

The receivers are "fatter" on the sides than on the top/bottom...So the least measurement will be 90º from horizontal...or straight up & down...That's the one we want...
Attached Images
File Type: jpg hood3.jpg (38.8 KB, 368 views)
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com