![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scottsboro, Alabama
Posts: 552
Thanks: 567
Thanked 449 Times in 170 Posts
|
Maybe this would be a good project to request data from others who are proficient with micrometers, or at least have micrometers--it's not that hard to do. You could then build a data base and perhaps key the measurements to particular variations. We all don't have the drawings, so if you can, post a drawing showing exactly where to measure. Interested?
__________________
Neil The hurrier I go the behinder I get. Sometimes it takes me all day to get nothing done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
Quote:
![]() "A" is the measurements in post # 12 above... "B" are these measurements, taken from the barrel hood to the bottom of the receiver lug... comm, 86434: "A"--.872"; "B"--0.966" 1937, 3649: "A"--.885; "B"--.976" [S/42] comm, 6782n: "A"--.878"; "B"--.972" Finn?, 77z: "A"--.873"; "B"--.965" 1917, 8514: "A"--.874"; "B"--.970" This is a better area of measurement; I believe the lug is held to higher tolerances than that area under the hood... ...And the "B" variance from least to most is only .011"... Last edited by sheepherder; 11-22-2009 at 10:13 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
I used a Starrett dial verniers for this little test...here's pic of my measuring...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
I have several 1" micrometers (well, who doesn't?
) but I prefer the dial verniers...they're easier to use... ![]() If anyone is going to make up a database for these measurements, I'll do a better job with my 5...Serial # link to measurements at least...and measure 5 times & take the average... Now...Why would anyone grind anything off the chamber hood??? I thought the idea of faking was to *add* characters to the receiver...crossed rifle, skull & bones, any date to a commercial... What would you grind off??? A year date??? Why??? I don't think whipping out a mic at a gun show and measuring a Luger is a good idea...It's sure to get ugly...and will draw a crowd like blood draws sharks...Even if the guy you're talking to is agreeable, the guy two tables over with a boosted Luger will complain about it...
Last edited by sheepherder; 11-21-2009 at 08:31 PM. Reason: wrong icon |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Scottsboro, Alabama
Posts: 552
Thanks: 567
Thanked 449 Times in 170 Posts
|
Gentlemen:
My measurements are as follows: "G" date, 7158a: "A"--0.875"; "B"--0.969". BYF42, 3732f: "A"--0.871"; "B"--0.968". Neil Young
__________________
Neil The hurrier I go the behinder I get. Sometimes it takes me all day to get nothing done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,208
Thanks: 1,425
Thanked 4,474 Times in 2,343 Posts
|
OK: I went back and re-measured all five of mine...This time I made sure I was *not* measuring across a date, or a number on the lug, or across a dent or ding...and I got several different measurements...so the letters/numbers and any dings or dents will affect the accuracy of the measurements...
![]() I also made sure I was as close as perpendicular to the horizontal plane as possible...I noticed that if I went just a bit off 90º that the measurement would change... ![]() The receivers are "fatter" on the sides than on the top/bottom...So the least measurement will be 90º from horizontal...or straight up & down...That's the one we want... |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|