![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
Amen to these comments! They took an almost perfect design (yes the right grip usually works lose on an original Luger if not properly oiled and cared for) and butchered it! I agree that the grip saftey is also a nightmare! Perhaps a longer one, like the Swiss original, wouldn't make you constantly and uncomfortablly grip the frame so tightly and unnaturally. Again, these 1970s Parabellums failed commercially. Perhaps they should have spent the few more dollars necessary to fabricate a more original Luger rather than take a 1929 Swiss and cheapen it. ![]() Sieger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon Coast
Posts: 95
Thanks: 1
Thanked 14 Times in 10 Posts
|
I'd guess the grip safety was also an appeasement to GCA '68. When liberals win we all lose for a looooooong time.
__________________
The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,154
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
Quote:
Hi: No, I don't think the GCA of 1968 had anything to do with it. They modified the original sear configuration, to save a few cents, and without the grip saftey, the pistol can be easily fired by simply picking it up the wrong way. Another blunder!!! Sieger PS Can someone tell me how to configure the spell checker in this new system? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|