LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Unread 11-17-2008, 06:03 PM   #6
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,974
Thanks: 2,072
Thanked 4,608 Times in 2,123 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by policeluger
It is against Fed. law to remove import marks......we've been through this before here.
Not to disagree, but that is not what I have been told. It is the law to have each one put on, there is nothing that says a import marking has to stay. Proposed rules state:
Quote:
Currently, there are no minimum standards concerning size and depth of impression for markings on firearms. The regulations require that the identifying information, including the serial number, be legible, conspicuous, and placed on the firearm â??â??in a manner not susceptible of being readily obliterated, altered, or removed.â??â??
There is not a ruling or law that I can find at the BATF that states it can not be removed, only that the first importer MUST mark them.
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com