LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > New Collectors Forum

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 03-01-2008, 05:57 PM   #1
h46pedro
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Opinion on Navy luger 1940

I would like to get some input for the experts on whether this is an original Navy or a put together.
This is the first time I have posted photos on this site and could not figure out how to post more than one. So my wife made a collage of the photos.
Thanks for you assistance,
Al
h46pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-01-2008, 06:02 PM   #2
h46pedro
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Here is the url for the photo.
http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/picture1.jpg
h46pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-01-2008, 07:50 PM   #3
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,040
Thanks: 1,106
Thanked 5,256 Times in 1,724 Posts
Default

Al,
Use the "ADD REPLY" button that will pop up a new window for your post and you can add multiple individual images just by repeated use of the "IMG" button. Just keep selecting it and pasting in the URL of each uploaded pic one at a time. The individual pics in your collage are way too small to be able to judge much about your Luger. I can see that the rear grip strap has a unit marking for "Ostsee" (East Sea) issue, and that is a good start at authenticating Navy use.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-02-2008, 10:27 AM   #4
h46pedro
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the tip on posting photos. I am still learning how to take and post photos.
Thanks for the input,
Al

h46pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-08-2008, 11:43 PM   #5
lugercollector
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: canada
Posts: 322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 25 Times in 15 Posts
Default

Looks suspect to me...property numbers are poorly stamped!!
lugercollector is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-09-2008, 09:40 AM   #6
George Anderson
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts
Default

Where, geographically, is this Luger coming from? I too think the property mark is suspect.
George Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-09-2008, 01:38 PM   #7
Jan C Still
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Box 240188, Douglas, Alaska, 99824
Posts: 463
Thanks: 0
Thanked 52 Times in 32 Posts
Default

Al
All the 1940 dated Navy Lugers that I have examined have a pantographed property number. These numbers look stamped! Probably a poor attempt to add value to a 1940 dated luger.
Jan
Jan C Still is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 03-11-2008, 07:46 PM   #8
h46pedro
User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

I am in eastern NC.
I appreciate all the replies on the luger. I am a little disapointed on the out come. I was hoping that it was the real deal. Oh well, you win some and you lose some.
Thanks again,
Al
h46pedro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com