1934-1935 mauser? Help and questions (good pic's of gun, holster & orginal bullets)..

GerColctor · 06-25-2008, 09:46 PM

Maybe I am missing something, this Luger doesn't have a sear or mag safety as far as I can see. Almost all police issued Lugers have sear safeties, but there are some exceptions.

A few G-Date Lugers with military acceptance marks were issued to the police, but they would have sear safeties.

The center part of the toggle (with the S/42) looks to have the number 67 in the photo. It may be your camera angle that makes the 8 look like a 6. This photo may have generated the comment concerning mismatched center toggle.

The holster is military style, which could be correct for this army proofed Luger, but it was probably issed with a later made holster. Based upon the 3 proofs E/63, this Luger was manufactured late in 1935.

Having two matching mags, outstanding.
Joe

06-25-2008, 09:46 PM	#10
GerColctor User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: CT & FL Posts: 315 Thanks: 2 Thanked 48 Times in 31 Posts	Maybe I am missing something, this Luger doesn't have a sear or mag safety as far as I can see. Almost all police issued Lugers have sear safeties, but there are some exceptions. A few G-Date Lugers with military acceptance marks were issued to the police, but they would have sear safeties. The center part of the toggle (with the S/42) looks to have the number 67 in the photo. It may be your camera angle that makes the 8 look like a 6. This photo may have generated the comment concerning mismatched center toggle. The holster is military style, which could be correct for this army proofed Luger, but it was probably issed with a later made holster. Based upon the 3 proofs E/63, this Luger was manufactured late in 1935. Having two matching mags, outstanding. Joe __________________ It is better to have lived a day as a tiger, then a thousand years as a lamb.