Certification of Compliance with 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(5)(B)

Crotalus · 09-20-2006, 01:05 PM

Perhaps I should have just started a new topic, I deleted the question from my previous C&R thread as no one responded and it was a a bit off topic, I just didnt want to clutter up the boards. Here is my question:

I had thought that the Certification of Compliance with 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(5)(B) was only needed for the older Curios & Relics FFL but I keep seeing it mentioned everywhere on the internet. Should I have sent a copy of this sheet that asks for your name twice and where you were born with my C&R application even though it is the newer type? Am I going to need to wait until I get the application back denied before submitting this form or can I somehow get it to them so they can finish my application (Somehow I doubt theyre organized enough to do that)? I would appreciate hearing from people who have obtained their C&R licenses somewhat recently too if possible and what you did.

Thanks,
Ken

09-20-2006, 01:05 PM	#1
Crotalus User Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Richmond, VA Posts: 68 Thanks: 0 Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post	Certification of Compliance with 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(5)(B) Perhaps I should have just started a new topic, I deleted the question from my previous C&R thread as no one responded and it was a a bit off topic, I just didnt want to clutter up the boards. Here is my question: I had thought that the Certification of Compliance with 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(5)(B) was only needed for the older Curios & Relics FFL but I keep seeing it mentioned everywhere on the internet. Should I have sent a copy of this sheet that asks for your name twice and where you were born with my C&R application even though it is the newer type? Am I going to need to wait until I get the application back denied before submitting this form or can I somehow get it to them so they can finish my application (Somehow I doubt theyre organized enough to do that)? I would appreciate hearing from people who have obtained their C&R licenses somewhat recently too if possible and what you did. Thanks, Ken