![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#37 |
|
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,974
Thanks: 2,072
Thanked 4,609 Times in 2,123 Posts
|
OK, I read through almost all of this and it's very obvious that Kyrie has strong opinions on the subject. That he looks at it as anything except original manufacture is a fake?? To me that's too extreme. However I was mentored by Bill Munis, who liked originality, and his reasoning was that if you found a piece that was numbered in that time period, that it would be logical to use it, if needed. Armors or depots would take a new part and number it, but an armorer could very well have simply used another part whether correctly numbered or not, the purpose was to get a gun working.
I do not agree with the reasoning that finding a numbered, period part is fakery. In many collecting fields it is acceptable to refinish. Such as, Cars, US military parts if it looks correct will be placed to make a " correct" Garand... Don't take me wrong, I like originality and strive for complexity original lugers. |
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|