1917 DWM Luger, Artillery style xx62e

DavidJayUden · 09-03-2012, 09:07 AM

Ed:
I respectfully disagree. Back in the day of the auto sears for the AR15, if you had one auto sear (or the bolt/carrier/trigger parts for the M16) AND you also had in your possession an AR15, it was "slap the cuffs on" time. The parts did not have to be on the gun.
So, my rationale that owning an artillery stock, not owning a pistol that it is legal on, would be as heinous in the eyes of the BATF.
It's probably academic, but that is one group that I sincerely hope to never do business with.
dju

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

09-03-2012, 09:07 AM	#5
DavidJayUden Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 4,047 Thanks: 578 Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts	Ed: I respectfully disagree. Back in the day of the auto sears for the AR15, if you had one auto sear (or the bolt/carrier/trigger parts for the M16) AND you also had in your possession an AR15, it was "slap the cuffs on" time. The parts did not have to be on the gun. So, my rationale that owning an artillery stock, not owning a pistol that it is legal on, would be as heinous in the eyes of the BATF. It's probably academic, but that is one group that I sincerely hope to never do business with. dju