![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#16 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,579
Thanks: 2,144
Thanked 402 Times in 251 Posts
|
![]() Quote:
The frame on the right looks like the springs and ammo have been properly matched, as their has been no breach block slap. The Luger was not designed to absorb a regular pounding at this point, and as previously stated, this pounding is a major cause of mechanical failure with this design. The Luger with the missing fin looks like it has taken quite a lot of pounding here and has failed. I agree with you that weak springs and/or too hot of ammo is the cause of this condition. Original DWM military ammo for the 9mm, circa WWI, was 123 gr bullet at 1,076 fps, a rather middle of the road load by today's standards. The much vaulted Commercial Winchester white box is 115 grs at 1,190 fps (according to the Winchester web site) or 11% over original specs. The current U.S. Army Nato load is 121grs at 1,260 fps or 17% over original specs. I believe that regular use of the "hot stuff", even with springs in spec, will eventually lead to problems. Now days when I'm shopping for a Luger, I'll try to examine this area for ususual wear. If it has taken a battering, I'll usually pass on the pistol and find one that hasn't. I handload for all of my shooting with my Lugers, and handload to the original specs. These loads are also extremely accurate. The Wolff #38 is the standard weight spring, but with "hot stuff", I'd try the 40 pounder. Sieger |
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|