A few C&R waiting to be destroyed

alvin · 01-14-2009, 09:49 AM

I believe the 7-year-sentence was a WARNING sign. There is no C&R in strict gun-banning world. Guns, regardless of types, show their "TRUE" face. Criminals could use Borchardt for robbery. There were reports of robbing cabs using Mauser, robbing banks using Inglis. Not because old ones were preferred, simply because it's not easy to get a modern one to perform the "job". Guns are not layered there.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

01-14-2009, 09:49 AM	#11
alvin User Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: US Posts: 3,843 Thanks: 132 Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts	I believe the 7-year-sentence was a WARNING sign. There is no C&R in strict gun-banning world. Guns, regardless of types, show their "TRUE" face. Criminals could use Borchardt for robbery. There were reports of robbing cabs using Mauser, robbing banks using Inglis. Not because old ones were preferred, simply because it's not easy to get a modern one to perform the "job". Guns are not layered there.