![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA - TN
Posts: 435
Thanks: 469
Thanked 223 Times in 102 Posts
|
Are these legit Navy marks on a luger (W.K 10425) and HKO MÜNCHEN 18 holster (S.A.R.312)?
I see no Navy crown/M marks on the gun. Instead, there is a vertical N/crown on receiver, and no date on the top of chamber, suggesting it is a commercial luger. But the receiver does have the 1916 date. Could it be a commercial luger reworked for the Navy or Weimar period? Last edited by Pistol; 12-14-2018 at 10:18 AM. Reason: Sar instead of SAB |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
May we see some more photos of the gun and holster? Does the gun have a 6" barrel and Navy rear sight?
Norm |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA - TN
Posts: 435
Thanks: 469
Thanked 223 Times in 102 Posts
|
This is best I could get from the seller. No navy rear sight and it has a 4 inch barrel.
Now looking at it, I think it is a 1916 Navy frame with a mismatched commercial top, and a replacement barrel. The barrel has no numbers but does have whay appears to be a WWII mauser proof 855? One wood bottom mag has X after the serial number. Also, a new serial number was etched in near the commercial C/N proof, apparently to match the toggle train. They etched in the last 2 digits of the toggle on the top of the extractor. Any value in the frame, holster and mag? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA - TN
Posts: 435
Thanks: 469
Thanked 223 Times in 102 Posts
|
More photos
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Joe,
I think your diagnosis is correct. Has the holster been shortened to P08 length? Norm |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA - TN
Posts: 435
Thanks: 469
Thanked 223 Times in 102 Posts
|
Yes...and the mag pouch looks wider
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
That's too bad, I've never seen an HKO holster, only pouches.
Norm |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA - TN
Posts: 435
Thanks: 469
Thanked 223 Times in 102 Posts
|
Yes shortened for 4-inch and mag pouch looks wider than normal.
Has a B.A. X stamp and the German words Wasch or Wazch Musik, which translates to washing music, or watch music? Seems odd, but I read that Schrage Musik was the name Germans gave to upward firing autocannon that were mounted to night fighter aircraft in WWII. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA - TN
Posts: 435
Thanks: 469
Thanked 223 Times in 102 Posts
|
Wow, 97 bids and over $2K. I guess someone thought it was legit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
Somebody may be in for some heartburn too...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
User
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 199
Thanks: 26
Thanked 320 Times in 113 Posts
|
Too bad, a correct unit marked 1916 is a very rare bird.
Like Norm, I've never seen an HKO holster, only pouches. Navy Frame, commercial receiver, Weimar or 3rd Reich era rework. IAW, a FrankenLuger.
__________________
- Mike Life member: NRA, OVMS, VGCA Member: NAPCA, N-SSA(Veteran) Si vis pacem, para bellum |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,443
Thanked 4,356 Times in 2,041 Posts
|
I believe the luger(at least the receiver) is a "Russian Capture"; see the electro pencil number on the left chamber- faint but there.
So a "East-Franken " luger. I'd like to have the frame though, to go with my 1916 navy receiver ; but I don't see the $2k anywhere in that rig.
__________________
03man(Don Voigt); Luger student and collector. Looking for DWM side plate: 69 ; Dreyse 1907 pistol K.S. Gendarmerie |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|