![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I recently purchased ammo for my P08. I purchased both Full Jacket and Hollow Points. Now, I am not sure that the hollow points will work. Should I try? or it is dangerous to try? Thanks
|
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to patlaceusa for your post: |
|
|
#2 |
|
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,974
Thanks: 2,072
Thanked 4,608 Times in 2,123 Posts
|
It would not not be dangerous, unless you bought +P or the like ammo....
It may not feed right, but you never know. From my artillery luger shooter, she will feed almost anything. ed
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
New User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
9MM Luger 115 GRS. JHP with a number 9APHP. Shall I try them? I have not fired this pistol at all as of yet. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Well, it depends on a lot of factors, the condition of the pistol not being the least of it.
If you are uncertain, consult a good gun smith first and get the pistol checked before attempting to fire it. A P08 in a good technical state shouldn't have issues with standard 9x19 ammuntion. A slower burning powder is preferable, that is the type that the pistol was designed around. Most modern powders are fast burning variations, which provide a different pressure curve. Other than that, the OAL (Overall Average Length) of the round plays a role in reliable feeding. Winchester 115gr 9x19 works well (100-round 'Valu-Pack'), Sellier & Bellot 124gr and even the 145gr 'subsonic' work well. I fired quite a lot of Fiocchi 7,65 para without problems also. |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|