upload photo | donate | calendar
|
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
08-03-2005, 09:06 PM
|
#1 |
|
User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts
|
Ku info from the other forum
For information sake to those of you who don't visit GUNBOARDS. http://www.gunboards.com/luger/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5328
__________________
dave |
|
|
|
08-03-2005, 10:26 PM
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
& Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Little NE of Somewhere...
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 478
Thanked 517 Times in 129 Posts
|
And the bottom line is the same - for those who have spent decades trying to fathom and reserach the "K�¼" markings, and personally, I believe Goertz's opinions (as quoted by Patrick V.) are the most correct thesis to date.
Frankly - I've been down the trail of finding the similiarity between the K98 and the Luger version "K�¼". Nope - sorry.... And oh - if you go here: http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthre...0&pagenumber=2 I'm also pretty damned certain it wasn't "K�¼strin" - which I sort of took user "MP38" to task on - after he did a 5 minute "google" search.... Just my $0.00002 John D. |
|
|
|
|
08-03-2005, 10:39 PM
|
#3 |
|
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,974
Thanks: 2,072
Thanked 4,607 Times in 2,123 Posts
|
You aren't at your phone in the office? Off work early ??
 
|
|
|
|
|
08-03-2005, 10:48 PM
|
#4 | |
|
Administrator
& Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: A Little NE of Somewhere...
Posts: 2,651
Thanks: 478
Thanked 517 Times in 129 Posts
|
Quote:
 Anywho - I'm trying to get caught up on e-mail, and I seem to be a bit - ummm - "backlogged"....Anyway - you called??  Sheesh..... I'm always the last to know..... Oh - this is about K�¼ lugers.... OK - On topic.... The bottom line is the same - for those who have spent decades trying to fathom and reserach the "K�¼" markings, and personally, I believe Goertz's opinions (as quoted by Patrick V.) are the most correct thesis to date. Frankly - I've been down the trail of finding the similiarity between the K98 and the Luger version "K�¼". Nope - sorry.... And oh - if you go here: http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthre...0&pagenumber=2 I'm also pretty damned certain it wasn't "K�¼strin" - which I sort of took user "MP38" to task on - after he did a 5 minute "google" search.... Just my $0.00002 John D. |
|
|
|
|
|
08-04-2005, 01:44 PM
|
#5 |
|
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,991 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Yes,
Kustrin was just a small local facility. Not equipped for major gun overhaul or gun building. Has been discussed before... I still believe my interpretation (involvement of Hungary and a 1942 aircraft contract with that country for a batch of used planes) is not bad either
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
