Ku info from the other forum
 

For information sake to those of you who don't visit GUNBOARDS. http://www.gunboards.com/luger/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=5328

And the bottom line is the same - for those who have spent decades trying to fathom and reserach the "K�¼" markings, and personally, I believe Goertz's opinions (as quoted by Patrick V.) are the most correct thesis to date.

Frankly - I've been down the trail of finding the similiarity between the K98 and the Luger version "K�¼". Nope - sorry....

And oh - if you go here:
http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthre...0&pagenumber=2

I'm also pretty damned certain it wasn't "K�¼strin" - which I sort of took user "MP38" to task on - after he did a 5 minute "google" search....

Just my $0.00002

John D.

You aren't at your phone in the office? Off work early ?? :D :roflmao: :D

Yea - just another terrific day at work.. :) Anywho - I'm trying to get caught up on e-mail, and I seem to be a bit - ummm - "backlogged"....

Anyway - you called??

;)

Sheesh..... I'm always the last to know.....

Oh - this is about K�¼ lugers.... OK - On topic....

The bottom line is the same - for those who have spent decades trying to fathom and reserach the "K�¼" markings, and personally, I believe Goertz's opinions (as quoted by Patrick V.) are the most correct thesis to date.

Frankly - I've been down the trail of finding the similiarity between the K98 and the Luger version "K�¼". Nope - sorry....

And oh - if you go here:
http://forum.lugerforum.com/showthre...0&pagenumber=2

I'm also pretty damned certain it wasn't "K�¼strin" - which I sort of took user "MP38" to task on - after he did a 5 minute "google" search....

Just my $0.00002

John D.

Yes,

Kustrin was just a small local facility. Not equipped for major gun overhaul or gun building. Has been discussed before...

I still believe my interpretation (involvement of Hungary and a 1942 aircraft contract with that country for a batch of used planes) is not bad either :D