![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
|
#1 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,138 Times in 2,176 Posts
|
1908, Last one I puchased was a phoney. This time I'm takeing no chances. Eric Esq. snookem13@aol.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Bill, is it bad politics to ask what authentic Imperial tools are going for today? And, if not, do you have another one?
Ferley |
|
|
|
| The following member says Thank You to Ferley for your post: |
|
|
#5 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 737 Times in 484 Posts
|
Ferley, IMHO most of the C/M ones that you'll see are spurious. I do have one with the M, but no crown available @$100. TH
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: PORT ST LUCIE, FLORIDA
Posts: 12,216
Thanks: 6,209
Thanked 4,138 Times in 2,176 Posts
|
Gramps came through. He was the one who sold my the Navy, TKS
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Tom,
Is the M tool authentic? Must it have both crown & m? I'm not sure how big my collection will get so, I would like to have at least one authentic tool to go with a Beautiful Navy that I just purchased. What would one run for a 1916 Navy? Ferley |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: South Lake Tahoe,CA.
Posts: 695
Thanks: 0
Thanked 70 Times in 56 Posts
|
A wild guess if you could find one would be $400 to $500.
Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Always A
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,607 Times in 933 Posts
|
Hi Ferley, Bob is right on the money. This well respected dealer is offering one for $395.00. Regards, Norm
http://www.collectorfirearms.org/ |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
User
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 524
Thanks: 0
Thanked 432 Times in 165 Posts
|
Norme- and I would wonder if it is correct. Early Navy tools were without acceptance stamps until 1910.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 737 Times in 484 Posts
|
Ferley, Not the correct tool for a WW1 Navy, although the basic tool appears to be of that era, the "M" is lightly struck and offer center, so also probably not the early Navy either. TH
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: San Diego
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Tom,
Thanks, but I have to wait till next month (gotta pay obama's boy geitner this month), I'll check back with you next payday. Since I want to shoot mine once in a while, doesn't make sense to buy a $500.00 tool to use at the range huh??????? Ferley |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|