![]() |
my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
![]() |
#1 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 23
Thanks: 4
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
![]()
I've considered liberating this 1915 DWM, but I'd like to know what these numbers on the back of the frame above the lanyard loop are? Based on my search of the forums, I think they are a rack a number... is this right? also any historical info on the unit would be appreciated, thanks gents.
link: http://www.legacy-collectibles.com/d...-magazine.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
|
![]()
Your questions are well over my pay grade, but that is one interesting Luger, very nice with original finish.
dju |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,369
Thanks: 7,432
Thanked 2,611 Times in 1,378 Posts
|
![]()
Is the size of the numbers on the backs of the grips correct?
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: US
Posts: 3,843
Thanks: 132
Thanked 729 Times in 438 Posts
|
![]()
Don't know the meaning of those numbers. To make sure about finish, need to erase the white filler on the stamp, and check halo around the stamp carefully under good light. Some guns were refurbished in Weimar era when it was relatively new, and those Weimar contractors knew German guns well (of course), their work is hard to detect. Not saying this being one, but better check everything.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: VA
Posts: 3,592
Thanks: 1,773
Thanked 2,531 Times in 788 Posts
|
![]()
Both markings are pre 1922 Reichswehr Provisional markings. 3.K.N.13. is probably 3rd Kompagnie, Nachrichten Abteiliung 13.
|
![]() |
![]() |
The following member says Thank You to George Anderson for your post: |
![]() |
|
|