LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All P-08 Military Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 06-27-2024, 04:50 PM   #1
f100
User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Hayden Idaho
Posts: 9
Thanks: 12
Thanked 32 Times in 7 Posts
Default Test firing my 1937 S/42

I’m going to run a magazine through my early S/42 , I’ve replaced the original matching numbered firing pin with an original backup as I’ve heard the strength of the metallurgy changes with age? Suggestions? Lighter loaded Ammo? Grains ? 115? Thoughts? Thanks Jim (also my AC41 P.38)
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_6765.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	168.7 KB
ID:	88732  

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_7108.jpg
Views:	2
Size:	196.8 KB
ID:	88733  

f100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 06-27-2024, 05:16 PM   #2
Roadster 02
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Rocky Mountain High
Posts: 308
Thanks: 168
Thanked 246 Times in 84 Posts
Default

I think the firing pin would be the least of my worries of breaking any part. Me, it would be the ejector.

Last edited by Roadster 02; 06-27-2024 at 06:18 PM.
Roadster 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Roadster 02 for your post:
Unread 06-27-2024, 07:46 PM   #3
Mac Cat
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Mac Cat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 686
Thanks: 2,035
Thanked 566 Times in 301 Posts
Default

... and, yes 115gr FMJ "target loads" are best.
Winchester or PPU if you can find them.
Avoid high powered "P+" or "NATO" ammunition.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Winchester White box 9mm.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	84.7 KB
ID:	88734  

Click image for larger version

Name:	Winchester white box 9mm ammo box.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	199.2 KB
ID:	88735  

Mac Cat is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to Mac Cat for your post:
Unread 06-27-2024, 11:31 PM   #4
f100
User
 
Join Date: May 2024
Location: Hayden Idaho
Posts: 9
Thanks: 12
Thanked 32 Times in 7 Posts
Default Which Ammo

Thanks , I do have the 124 grain modest load Blazer brass @1090 FPS ?
f100 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to f100 for your post:
Unread 06-28-2024, 08:27 AM   #5
velodog455~
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2023
Posts: 55
Thanks: 9
Thanked 34 Times in 23 Posts
Default

The Blazer brass would be my recommendation if you don't have the ability to make reduced power reloads.

It is possibly the new WWB. Lots of people are having problems with WWB these days, myself included. It is now made both in the U.S. and Bosnia. Running it through my chronograph revealed a 200 fps velocity standard deviation. And it's now referred to as "Training Ammo", printed on the box as such. The Blazer Brass is better IMHO, and priced about the same.

Regardless, either brand with 115 grain bullets will put a bit less recoil stress on the pistol than 124 grainers. There are people who will say they shoot full bore loads through their P.08's and have done so for years with no bad results. I'm an abundance of caution kinda guy and can reload reduced power rounds, so I do. I shoot steel plates at 25 yards at about 750 fps and I have noted that the plates can't tell any difference at all. Ditto for paper targets.

All the above caveats absolutely apply to your P.38, perhaps even more so, as I have seen more broken parts on WW2 P.38's than P.08's, which is why so many people suggest buying a post-war P1 for regular range shooting.

If your 1937 P.08 is a collectible, then running a couple of magazines through it should be OK to verify function, but if you want a Luger to shoot regularly then you would be better off buying a "shooter grade" in the $1,000-$1,200 price range as opposed to taking a similar value hit on your 1937 Luger should you break a serial numbered part. Just my 2 cents worth. Differing opinions may be forthcoming.
-Bob

Last edited by velodog455~; 06-28-2024 at 08:36 AM. Reason: Clarity
velodog455~ is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to velodog455~ for your post:
Unread 06-28-2024, 11:05 AM   #6
Doubs
User
 
Doubs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Byron, Georgia
Posts: 1,683
Thanks: 780
Thanked 1,637 Times in 536 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by f100 View Post
Thanks , I do have the 124 grain modest load Blazer brass @1090 FPS ?
On the surface that load is almost identical to the WW1 German military load which was a 123 grain bullet at approximately 1090 fps. Depending upon the powder burn rate, it should work well. If you have any doubts, use the Winchester 115 grain loads.
Doubs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com