LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 11-17-2008, 01:54 PM   #1
cma22inc
User
 
cma22inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 93
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

So is Ken still accepting new work or did I read that wrong?

What are the groups toughts on restoring an import marked DWM Finnish contract I plan to keep as a shooter?
cma22inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 02:16 PM   #2
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,915
Thanks: 1,989
Thanked 4,506 Times in 2,080 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by cma22inc
So is Ken still accepting new work or did I read that wrong?

What are the groups toughts on restoring an import marked DWM Finnish contract I plan to keep as a shooter?
Whats the purpose of restoring it (that isn't meant sarcastically).

If the entire purpose is to make it look like it did from the factory and you like the clean looks like that, then do so.

If it is to get rid of the import marking, then have it done.


Otherwise, i feel SA guns were used over a long period of time and would leave them be.


Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker
************
Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers
Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 02:38 PM   #3
policeluger
RIP
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ca.
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 8
Thanked 89 Times in 54 Posts
Default

It is against Fed. law to remove import marks......we've been through this before here.
policeluger is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 02:52 PM   #4
cma22inc
User
 
cma22inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 93
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Sorry did not mean an implications on the import marks. I know they are there forever. Just mentioned them as they tend to lower the value somewhat which in this case keeps the pistol in the realm of shooter it is after all mismatched and I'm sure the Fins redid her at least once already.

I'm of like mind as others here and would never think of restoring one more collectible.

The one I have has alot of wear on the finish and I plan to shoot it quite a lot. I wanted to dress the ole girl and protect the metal.

Just wanted to see where you guys stood on the Finnish contract models.

Thanks
cma22inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 03:47 PM   #5
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,150
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,304 Times in 1,096 Posts
Default

It is a parts gun... so I would say go for it if you want her to look pretty... it wouldn't be putting lipstick on a pig... This gun will always be a lady.
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 05:03 PM   #6
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,915
Thanks: 1,989
Thanked 4,506 Times in 2,080 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by policeluger
It is against Fed. law to remove import marks......we've been through this before here.
Not to disagree, but that is not what I have been told. It is the law to have each one put on, there is nothing that says a import marking has to stay. Proposed rules state:
Quote:
Currently, there are no minimum standards concerning size and depth of impression for markings on firearms. The regulations require that the identifying information, including the serial number, be legible, conspicuous, and placed on the firearm â??â??in a manner not susceptible of being readily obliterated, altered, or removed.â??â??
There is not a ruling or law that I can find at the BATF that states it can not be removed, only that the first importer MUST mark them.
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 05:08 PM   #7
cma22inc
User
 
cma22inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 93
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default


I should have left my question (still unanswered) about if Ken was still accepting new restoration work and not to bring up another gun unrelated to the original posts.


cma22inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 09:26 PM   #8
Edward Tinker
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer
LugerForum
Patron
 
Edward Tinker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,915
Thanks: 1,989
Thanked 4,506 Times in 2,080 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by cma22inc
I should have left my question (still unanswered) about if Ken was still accepting new restoration work and not to bring up another gun unrelated to the original posts.


I don't know Ken, perhaps someone has his contact info and you can ask?


Ed
Edward Tinker is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-17-2008, 09:34 PM   #9
Tomathvl
User
 
Tomathvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milan, IN
Posts: 363
Thanks: 3
Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Ken's number is in the post; give him a call.

Quote:
Here's a shooter I had built up. Grips and barrel by Hugh Clark, Rust blue, fire blue and straw by Ken Karsted. If anyone is interested in getting work done by Ken his number is 847-234-0441, he lives in Lake Forest, IL. He's been doing restorations for 40 years.
Tomathvl is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-19-2008, 04:19 PM   #10
Navy
RIP
 
Navy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Default

Tom,

What is the quality of his work? Is he a "Thor" or a Gale Morgan?

Tom A
Navy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-21-2008, 08:31 AM   #11
Tomathvl
User
 
Tomathvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milan, IN
Posts: 363
Thanks: 3
Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts
Default

Tom
Sent a PM
Tom
Tomathvl is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-21-2008, 04:51 PM   #12
cma22inc
User
 
cma22inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Tampa Bay FL
Posts: 93
Thanks: 1
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Default

Can you PM me the same I'm curious too.

Might have a shooter of mine reworked.
cma22inc is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-21-2008, 07:37 PM   #13
Tomathvl
User
 
Tomathvl's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Milan, IN
Posts: 363
Thanks: 3
Thanked 48 Times in 19 Posts
Default

He did an excellent job on my shooter. Have you looked at the photos? My shooter was in good condition physically and had some type of after market finish like Teflon or ???? . He stripped the old finish, and did some touch up. The new barrel finish didn’t match the gun so he touched up the barrel and refinished the entire gun. I don’t know how or if he will work on really dinged up guns, you’d have to ask. I think he likes fast turn around refinish work but you’d have to ask. His prices were extremely cheap for what he did; cheaper than Thor’s.



Ken is used by many dealers to Refurb their wares. He goes to all the big shows in this area OGCA, Louisville, SOS, etc and makes the rounds of the dealers. I’ve seen his work on many dealer tables.

Hope this helps.

Tom
Tomathvl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com