my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
11-11-2010, 11:07 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Mec Gar Magazine Luger
I purchased a Mec Gar Italy made Mag for my DWM 30 cal and they sent the P08 9mm mag. Will this work???? It looks exactly like the original and took ammo and I hand ejected and it locked on the last round.........?????? Any input would be great!!!
|
11-11-2010, 11:18 PM | #2 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
There is absolutely no difference between a 30 cal and a 9mm Luger magazine, both cartridges use the same magazine.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
11-11-2010, 11:20 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Mec Gar Mag
Thanks!!!!!!!!!
|
11-12-2010, 09:18 AM | #4 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Slight correction: Mauser original contracted a Dutch firm to make it's mags for the Parabellum. When these were no longer available, Interarms ordered replacement spares from MecGar, marked Interarms on the spine. TH
|
11-12-2010, 09:32 AM | #5 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 978
Thanks: 68
Thanked 127 Times in 108 Posts
|
If you get a chance, take a look/compare the two cartridges. The aft 2/3's are the same. Now you understand where the 9mm came from.
FN |
11-13-2010, 12:03 PM | #6 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Strangely, Mauser did have different part numbers for it's 7.65P & 9mmP mags. When I purchased all of Interarms remaining Parabellum parts. I received a few slips of Mauser logo paper showing the caliber & part number of the mag enclosed with it. I have not studied these mags enough to see if there is any difference in the length of the feed lips, but if there is, the effect is negligable. TH
|
11-13-2010, 12:52 PM | #7 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Tom, we also found some traces of this in the Mauser archives.
I think the main reason for distinguishing between the 9mm and the .30 luger versions of (essentially the same) magazine was to avoid discussions with certain countries where 9mm as a bullet, and also the magazines are prohibited. When you mark them as .30 luger magazines, they suddenly stop being 9mm magazines officially |
11-14-2010, 01:34 AM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 183
Thanked 281 Times in 162 Posts
|
Gerben,
I remember you stating that the spring tension was different for .30 Luger and 9mm mags. The discussion was about the 'Cal. 9mm' marked wooden bottom mags. Did the use of different tension mag springs continue throughout Luger production?
__________________
Mike C. |
11-14-2010, 05:11 PM | #9 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 525
Thanks: 129
Thanked 139 Times in 76 Posts
|
Furthermore, unlike their Dutch predecessors, MecGar magazines will work in the Mauser Parabellum and other Luger variants.
__________________
Michael Zeleny@post.harvard.edu -- http://larvatus.livejournal.com/ -- 7576 Willow Glen Road, Los Angeles, CA 90046 -- 323.363.1860 All of old. Nothing else ever. Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. -- Samuel Beckett |
11-17-2010, 08:20 PM | #10 | |
User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: New York, NY
Posts: 1,575
Thanks: 2,124
Thanked 400 Times in 249 Posts
|
Quote:
I agree that the spring tension seems lighter in the 7.65 mags. Sieger |
|
|
|