LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Doubs · 11-07-2003, 12:11 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by John Sabato:
I don't think they would be inclined to add them or the Stainless Steel (Mitchell, Stoeger, AIMCO, or Orimar) guns to the list simply because they don't meet the 50-year old criteria that the C&R list was designed for.<hr /></blockquote>John, I think Sieger's question is if the 1970's Swiss-style Parabellums are C&R, why aren't the Parabellums of the same time period, made by the same company, with the traditional grip contour also C&R? I've often wondered the same thing and it's my opinion that someone requested the Swiss-style Mausers be C&R - and it was approved - while no one has gone to the trouble of submitting the paperwork for the others. Just my thoughts on it.

11-07-2003, 12:11 PM	#5
Doubs User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Byron, Georgia Posts: 1,736 Thanks: 819 Thanked 1,769 Times in 586 Posts	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by John Sabato: <strong>I don't think they would be inclined to add them or the Stainless Steel (Mitchell, Stoeger, AIMCO, or Orimar) guns to the list simply because they don't meet the 50-year old criteria that the C&R list was designed for.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">John, I think Sieger's question is if the 1970's Swiss-style Parabellums are C&R, why aren't the Parabellums of the same time period, made by the same company, with the traditional grip contour also C&R? I've often wondered the same thing and it's my opinion that someone requested the Swiss-style Mausers be C&R - and it was approved - while no one has gone to the trouble of submitting the paperwork for the others. Just my thoughts on it.