LugerForum Discussion Forums - View Single Post

Big Norm · 03-26-2002, 11:33 PM

Tom,

I saw your nice write up on navy Lugers. I also mentioned in a response thread that there were 1915 and 1918 navies. I must be wrong. My statement was based on seeing Ralphs list of Lugers and also seeing the 1918 navy. I think that he had two of them in his list.

But on reviewing Jan Stills book, I see that there were 4231 1918's delivered. No mention of the 1915's. So it looks like I was wrong on the 1915's. But would the 1918's have a chamber date of 1918?

Kenyon in "Luger at Random" says that he has never seen examples of a 1914 or 1915 navy. No mention of the 1918.

Big Norm

03-26-2002, 11:33 PM	#6
Big Norm RIP Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: SE Michigan Posts: 1,864 Thanks: 1 Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts	Re: 1918 Navy, Again ;] Tom, I saw your nice write up on navy Lugers. I also mentioned in a response thread that there were 1915 and 1918 navies. I must be wrong. My statement was based on seeing Ralphs list of Lugers and also seeing the 1918 navy. I think that he had two of them in his list. But on reviewing Jan Stills book, I see that there were 4231 1918's delivered. No mention of the 1915's. So it looks like I was wrong on the 1915's. But would the 1918's have a chamber date of 1918? Kenyon in "Luger at Random" says that he has never seen examples of a 1914 or 1915 navy. No mention of the 1918. Big Norm