View Single Post
Unread 10-06-2012, 11:13 AM   #35
ithacaartist
Twice a Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
ithacaartist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Atop the highest hill in Schuyler County NY
Posts: 3,290
Thanks: 7,055
Thanked 2,482 Times in 1,323 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Wood View Post
... it is the possession of a stock without having a correct corresponding Luger if you also own any Luger(s) for which the stock is not correct. It is the improper combination of stock and gun that is illegal, not the stock per se. You have to have a gun that is correct for the stock to qualify for the exemption if you own other Lugers that do not qualify…period.
Is this still true if the non-correct Luger has no stock lug--meaning that it could not be physically combined? I'd think this would not support a claim of constructive intent, and be legal.
__________________
"... Liberty is the seed and soil, the air and light, the dew and rain of progress, love and joy."-- Robert Greene Ingersoll 1894
ithacaartist is offline   Reply With Quote