![]() |
Superman Lugers
|
Absolutely Stunning! <img src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" border="0" alt="[cheers]" />
|
RK,
Is it possible that you found the source of the .45 Luger carbine? |
Carl, never crossed my mind, just went back and went thru the entire site, no doubt that this guy could do it.
RK |
That guy is either on drugs or worked for Weatherby.
Some of those things look like sick jokes and are a waste of a good Luger. Is that a humor website or something? Give me a break.... |
Whenever some enterprising, ingenious entrepreneur tackles the task of production and marketing, the legacy of the Luger will not be over. Blow-backs will be a thing of the past.
|
RK,
We could only hope the starter lugers were beyond shooter quality and this craftsman breathed some new life into old, useless guns. Sort of look like Rambo-lugers, to me... Not my particular cup-o-tea...! <img src="graemlins/xyxwave.gif" border="0" alt="[bigbye]" /> |
I agree with Rick, I have shooter Lugers and collector Lugers and I feel the shooter Luger is a lot more fun (and accurate) with some type of devise (scope) to improve the sights.
Lonnie |
Sorry for my outburst. I guess that I'm old fashioned. I don't doubt that fellow does excellent work, but seeing such a mess of parts rather degraded the venerable old Luger in my eyes, and offended me.
It's my problem I guess, but I personally prefer the classic look and modern look to stay separate. Perhaps we'll see Darth Vader holding one of those contraptions in the next Star Wars movie? |
I've got the same problem. I do not like plastic futuristic (aka modern) guns. I've got a pre ban Colt AR SP2 that I have a lot of money in with 30 rd magazines, Colt scope, cheek pad, carry case, ect, and it rarely leaves the rack. Excellent gun, very accurate, I just don't like to shoot it. I'll take down an old WWII era bolt action every time and go plinking, or take an 03 or M-1 deer or coyote hunting.
RK |
I am allergic to the printed word, so I avoided the text that this fellow slapped on his English page. I agree with the above statements that there were a bunch of good Luger parts wasted. If a machinist thinks that he is such a prima-donna, why does he not totally manufacture the pistol? It is not that difficult to produce a proven system whenever no research and development is required.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2025, Lugerforum.com