![]() |
1908 Navy
Okay, no Imperial Luger books at the house, so tell me what I have here if someone could :)
It went to england at one time, and is marked with their "normal" proofs on the left and under the barrel. Sorry those pics turned out so poor. Its not as pretty as any of Tom's, but it is a real navy with a navy marking on the mag. so, when did they make mags like this?? Ed http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy1_copy1.jpg http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy2_copy1.jpg http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy3.jpg http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy4.jpg http://forum.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy5.jpg |
Hey Ed, Finally got a Navy! Not a bad looking pistol.
Ron |
Ed,
maybe not as good as one of Toms and maybe it has British proof marks, but I think its beautiful. The locking bolt looks like it hasn't been messed with. (You know that is one of those things that I look at first) The only thing that I wonder about is the little finger of the side plate has what looks like it has a crown with maybe "9 mp" stamped on it. I have to look at one of my navies to see if that marking is there. I don't remember, right off hand, seeing that on my navies. Big Norm |
Ed, I just saw the same British mark on your receiver just above the same mark on the side plates finger. It must be part of the British marking routine. The grips look pretty good. Are they numbered to the gun? Nice buy. Big Norm
PS I got my new computer. Yep, its a Mac.:D |
Hey Big Norm, I asumed mp was a brit stamp??
Ed |
Nice looking Navy Ed! Would you believe "BNP"? The Crown/BNP is the "British Nitro Proof" and its use dates from the early 1950s.
|
One of the 'stories' with British proofs that some dealers use to add "
value" to a luger is this. I have even heard this story from one of the larger dealers that should know better (or probably does...). 1. Gun was captured by the British and taken back to England. 2. Gun was then proofed and sent back with British commando's doing infiltration work behind the German lines. This story never made any sense to me. Why the heck would a British commando dressed up as a German soldier behind German lines want to carry a luger with its newly added British proofs...??? Why not pin a bull's eye and sign on his back that says..."British commando/spy...shoot here"....??? I think the gun came over : 1. Either as a Brit bring back just after WWII and was inspected/proofed based on English gun proofing laws. 2. Gun came over to England later in the 1950's or later and was proofed according to proofing laws in effect at the time of importation. As Ron Wood metnioned, probably the case with this Navy... Based on the type of British proofs applied, I think a luger with early proofs and its ties to a British bring-back vet would be more interesting to own than a later British importation piece...IMHO. Ed, since you like war stories tied to lugers...I would opt to find a bring-back Navy rather than one of the later importationn lugers...if I were in your shoes... |
All,
The *most likely* explanation for the Brit proofs is that the piece was once owned by Sam Cummings' company, Interarms. Sam had massive warehouses of weapons stored in England and in Monaco. The Brits required the proofing as a condition of entry and storage into the UK. Tom A. |
OK Guys,
that takes care of the First question, I'm very interested in the answer to the second guestion about the mags? Tom, or Norm any ideas or comments Jim |
The non-concentric ring mags start showing up in the low to mid range of 1908 Nay guns. There doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to their appearance as concentric rings are also intermixed in the same serial number range. A plausable theory is that they were pulled out of stock that was made for the Army to relieve a production shortfall or two.
In any event, I have examples of concentric ring mags on Navy guns dated 1917 and non-concentric with guns produced well before 1914. Kinda reminds me of the property mark conundrum. Tom A |
Thanks Tom, I wondered...
Quote:
|
Quote:
In all of my years on this forum, this is the funniest thing I have ever read!! I can just see the Brit now with his back to the wall trying to explain the British proofs on his Lange P-08 to a German officer. Ha!! Sieger |
Hey Pete, go easy on our buddy. I don't know what he paid for this beauty, but except for a ding on the side plate and maybe some pitting on the front of the trigger guard, he has a nice navy here. All the original markings look pretty crisp and nowadays just having a navy Luger is an accomplishment. Someday, having British markings on an otherwise nice but rare navy Luger won't matter that much.
Ed, what about the grips? Are they numbered to the gun? Whats the bore like? Contrary to what you emailed to me, the gun is definately not ugly. There are a lot of guys out there who would love to have it. Now you have to get a navy holster and a navy stock. Maybe a WW1 German navy hat to wear to the range when you shoot your prize. Maybe a little WW1 German style curl on your mustache. Yah! That'll do it! A mustache with curls at the tips is that finishing touch. Anyway, nice going. Big Norm |
Quote:
Now, I need some old west pictures of cowboys and luggers!! ;) Ed |
OH! OH! Watch out world, here comes Quick Draw Tinker. I always wondered something...wasn't there once a famous TV star named Tinker Bell? I don't think that he had a mustache though.
Big Norm |
"He" did carry a 9mm tho :D
|
Quick Draw Tinker
Big Norm,
ROTFLMAO.....:roflmao: ED, I can see you now Q.D.T.....trying to pull that new Navy of yours out of an HHH flap holster facing down some bad HOMBRE at 20 paces..... :D :roflmao: side note: will put in a good word for you and your dad and family...... Best Regards, Paul |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2026, Lugerforum.com