Bakelite mag Question

John D. · 06-04-2003, 09:48 AM

As Peter mentions he has a RIG - would it be possible to get a picture of the inside holster flap?

Also - I'm not sure why Ku are referred to as "Krieghoffs", as I've never seen any definative documentation saying these were produced, assembled or even reworked by HK? If, in theory - Mauser provided the frames/assy for the Ku Lugers, then I also don't think it's "impossible" to have a proper FXO mag stamped without the Ku prefix/suffix? For that, it would be interesting to see if the mag also has "+" stamped under the digets and/or whether the stamps on the FXO base are the same dies as used on the frame...

Not to open the "great" KU debate - but... Hmmmmm - actually, it would be interesting to perhaps open the discussion in this Forum, and see where it leads..??!!!

Best to all..!

06-04-2003, 09:48 AM	#5
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 478 Thanked 517 Times in 129 Posts	As Peter mentions he has a RIG - would it be possible to get a picture of the inside holster flap? Also - I'm not sure why Ku are referred to as "Krieghoffs", as I've never seen any definative documentation saying these were produced, assembled or even reworked by HK? If, in theory - Mauser provided the frames/assy for the Ku Lugers, then I also don't think it's "impossible" to have a proper FXO mag stamped without the Ku prefix/suffix? For that, it would be interesting to see if the mag also has "+" stamped under the digets and/or whether the stamps on the FXO base are the same dies as used on the frame... Not to open the "great" KU debate - but... Hmmmmm - actually, it would be interesting to perhaps open the discussion in this Forum, and see where it leads..??!!! Best to all..!