Has to be third or more conspirator in Boston

Curly1 · 04-22-2013, 08:52 PM

Here is a long but informative link on why he didn't have his Miranda rights read.

https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/p...1/legal_digest

Long story short there was a ruling back in the 80's that allows questioning w/o a miranda warning when public safety is at risk.

In this case trying to detemine if there were more terroists planning more bombings or more bombs planted.

According to this article I think it will hold up.

04-22-2013, 08:52 PM	#18
Curly1 User Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Upstate New York Posts: 1,256 Thanks: 126 Thanked 718 Times in 375 Posts	Here is a long but informative link on why he didn't have his Miranda rights read. https://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/p...1/legal_digest Long story short there was a ruling back in the 80's that allows questioning w/o a miranda warning when public safety is at risk. In this case trying to detemine if there were more terroists planning more bombings or more bombs planted. According to this article I think it will hold up. __________________ Laugh hard and often. Gary