The "Asterisk" Again

bill m · 11-24-2001, 02:32 PM

Hi Viggo,

Hmmmm, well, I did not think I was condemning. This whole discussion is just pure non-sense now. You know Viggo, I think this theory has a lot of holes in it and it isn't correct. That is my opinion. There are too many questions that point to another answer. If asking questions and pointing out other views is condemning, if not agreeing is condemning, then I'm sure guilty as charged. Marvin's question has been asked many times with the general opinion that it is a hardness test done at random in batches from 10 to 100. Is the "*" the hardness test? You say no. Was the barrel checked some other place for hardness? You do not know and either do I. Is the hardness theory the correct one? We do not know. I think it is, but you do not and have stated so, so are you questioning or condemning me and my opinion? There was another theory a while back about black plastic grips and when they came into use. We supplied an answer based on collected data, which was not accepted. A German gave a bull**** story, which was repeated, and it became fact and was even suggested to be added in the tech. division. The German story proved to be completely fabricated. So Viggo, you believe any bull**** story you want to, as they soon grow to be fact, but as for me, I want evidence and proof to support any new theory. I feel you have taken my comments completely out of context and twisted my intentions into something they were never intended to do, especially with your comments about condemning, and disrupting the discussion.

11-24-2001, 02:32 PM	#11
bill m User Join Date: Oct 2004 Posts: 385 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Condemn? Hi Viggo, Hmmmm, well, I did not think I was condemning. This whole discussion is just pure non-sense now. You know Viggo, I think this theory has a lot of holes in it and it isn't correct. That is my opinion. There are too many questions that point to another answer. If asking questions and pointing out other views is condemning, if not agreeing is condemning, then I'm sure guilty as charged. Marvin's question has been asked many times with the general opinion that it is a hardness test done at random in batches from 10 to 100. Is the "" the hardness test? You say no. Was the barrel checked some other place for hardness? You do not know and either do I. Is the hardness theory the correct one? We do not know. I think it is, but you do not and have stated so, so are you questioning or condemning me and my opinion? There was another theory a while back about black plastic grips and when they came into use. We supplied an answer based on collected data, which was not accepted. A German gave a bull* story, which was repeated, and it became fact and was even suggested to be added in the tech. division. The German story proved to be completely fabricated. So Viggo, you believe any bull** story you want to, as they soon grow to be fact, but as for me, I want evidence and proof to support any new theory. I feel you have taken my comments completely out of context and twisted my intentions into something they were never intended to do, especially with your comments about condemning, and disrupting the discussion.