LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Navy Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 01-04-2004, 09:09 PM   #1
Tony S.
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post Another Odd Weimar Navy Luger

<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navyweimar_love.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navyweimar_love.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>
This one once was a 1917 Navy (Chamber Top and side) with a shorter replaced barrel C/N. It is all matching. It is not mine, I wish! I may have other pics. I was looking at it for a while, but I thought that the price was too high. I did not have anything else to compare with since it was the first time that I have actually seen one (other than books). I just want to share and hear your thoughts.
Thanks, Tony
<img border="0" alt="[cheers]" title="" src="graemlins/beerchug.gif" />
Tony S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-04-2004, 10:18 PM   #2
Navy
RIP
 
Navy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Post

Hi Tony,

An interesting Weimar conversion. This gun, from what I can see, is legit. I'd be proud to look at more of it and possibly add it to my collection assuming internals were up to snuff.

If I may ask, what was the asking price?

Tom A.
Navy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2004, 12:12 PM   #3
Tony S.
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

The asking price was $3600. I liked it myself, but the $$ was too high for me. Everything looked right inside and out. I think that the grips were right, but I dont think that they were marked. Also, I think that the witness mark were not perfectly aligned if I remember correctly. I have included more pics.
<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy_front.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy_front.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>
<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy_side.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy_side.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>

<a href="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy_top.jpg" target="_fullview"><img src="http://forums.lugerforum.com/lfupload/navy_top.jpg" width="400" alt="Click for fullsize image" /></a>

The gun came from the same collector that had the Fat Barrel that I posted earlier.
Thanks, Tony
Tony S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2004, 02:03 PM   #4
Navy
RIP
 
Navy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Post

Tony,

That gun is priced about $15-1600 too high. The Texan will die with that gun before he moves it at almost double its market value.

Tom A.
Navy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2004, 02:13 PM   #5
Pete Ebbink
User
 
Pete Ebbink's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
Post

IMHO...and I am just guessing...but the side plate does not seem to match the gun. I understood only the early 1900 models have a side plate that has its upper, left hand corner (closest to the muzzle end..) very sharp and squarish...around 1906 and later, the typical upper, left hand corner is filed with a radius...

Shouldn't this one have the more rounded, cornered side plate...?

(Self-edited 1-5-04 : After Tony S. posted the follow-up photos, I got the answer to my concern...firt photo appeared to show something that is not there...)

Regards,

Pete...
Pete Ebbink is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-05-2004, 09:40 PM   #6
Tony S.
User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 173
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Tom,
I agree with you as far as the price. Actually, I was guessing a value of about $1700 or so.
Tony
Tony S. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-06-2004, 01:37 PM   #7
Navy
RIP
 
Navy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
Post

Tony,
I was being "generous" in my evaluation...I have purchased similar guns for $1500 within past 2 years.

Tom A
Navy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com