LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Early Lugers (1900-1906)

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 08-08-2014, 08:00 PM   #21
LugerVern
User
 
LugerVern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Sn 4460 is referenced in the old Lugers at Random book as being highest SN known.

This is likely where the 5000 produced came from

It is my understanding that roughly 1000 M2's were transferred to the Navy, these guns may or may not have had the M2 crest and may help explain the missing 1000 guns

So you may have a scattering of M2's in the higher ranges but most went to the Navy.

all of this is theory and no one has proven it as of this date but obviously more than one collector has come across this before but no follow through.

Some research is needed:

Interesting.

For those of you tracking this there are more than one variation of M2 crest.

Vern
LugerVern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2014, 04:19 AM   #22
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LugerVern View Post
Sn 4460 is referenced in the old Lugers at Random book as being highest SN known.

This is likely where the 5000 produced came from

It is my understanding that roughly 1000 M2's were transferred to the Navy, these guns may or may not have had the M2 crest and may help explain the missing 1000 gunsSo you may have a scattering of M2's in the higher ranges but most went to the Navy.

all of this is theory and no one has proven it as of this date but obviously more than one collector has come across this before but no follow through.

Some research is needed:

Interesting.

For those of you tracking this there are more than one variation of M2 crest.

Vern
Can you tell me the source of that info? I've never heard of that before and since the Navy had it's own independent contracts, and in a different caliber to boot, I find that transfer rather unlikely. For the later 9mm Army contracts it's quite possible.

On the other hand there's allways the possibility that the Army transferred some weapons to the GNR when it was created, and if so maybe it's where the defacing of some of the pistols was done.

Last edited by kurusu; 08-12-2014 at 04:48 AM.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-11-2014, 10:51 AM   #23
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

To Douglas Jr.

Your profile doesn't allow private messages. So, Thanks
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-12-2014, 09:34 AM   #24
Douglas Jr.
User
 
Douglas Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South America
Posts: 948
Thanks: 598
Thanked 584 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurusu View Post
To Douglas Jr.

Your profile doesn't allow private messages. So, Thanks
Really? I will fix that.
But I'm glad you enjoy it.
Douglas
Douglas Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-20-2014, 03:22 PM   #25
Douglas Jr.
User
 
Douglas Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South America
Posts: 948
Thanks: 598
Thanked 584 Times in 254 Posts
Default

I found this at ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LUGER-P08-BA...item35db10f1a0

It is the barrel - receiver - toggle assembly from a M2 Portuguese Luger.
The barrel bears serial number 3647 (with the circled triangle just below it). The receiver, however, does not match it.

Douglas.
Douglas Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-21-2014, 08:13 PM   #26
LugerVern
User
 
LugerVern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Thanks Douglas!
Still leaves roughly 1495 missing guns
I know some guns were defaced but honestly I have only seen maybe 20 in the past 10 years.

There is something missing to the Portuguese story.
It is unfortunate that more research has not been done, same goes for the Brazilian contract.

We suffer from lack of interest but much has yet to be discovered-- interesting to me

Show me one early picture of the Portuguese Navy with luger side arms? Any body got one?

Vern
LugerVern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2014, 04:07 AM   #27
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LugerVern View Post
Thanks Douglas!
Still leaves roughly 1495 missing guns
I know some guns were defaced but honestly I have only seen maybe 20 in the past 10 years.
Vern
Mine is defaced # 2703. Make it 21.
And I still have no proved explanation for the defaced pistols both Army and Navy.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2014, 06:25 AM   #28
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LugerVern View Post
Show me one early picture of the Portuguese Navy with luger side arms? Any body got one?

Vern
Best I could get.

Portuguese Navy Batallion leaving for Angola in 1914.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Batalhao_Marinha_Partida_1914.jpg
Views:	23
Size:	58.0 KB
ID:	42987
Click image for larger version

Name:	Batalhao_Marinha_Alcantara_1914.jpg
Views:	27
Size:	48.5 KB
ID:	42988
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2014, 08:40 AM   #29
Douglas Jr.
User
 
Douglas Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South America
Posts: 948
Thanks: 598
Thanked 584 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Those pictures made my day. Thank you Mário!
Douglas Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2014, 09:09 AM   #30
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Jr. View Post
Those pictures made my day. Thank you Mário!
You might as well see it all.

http://www.momentosdehistoria.com/MH_02_10_Marinha.htm
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to kurusu for your post:
Unread 08-22-2014, 10:28 AM   #31
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,181
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,438 Times in 2,327 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurusu View Post
Interesting reading!

Google translates the battalion as 'marine' but I think it should be better translated as 'maritime'...

What is a 'soliped'??? A camel??? A horse???

Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Jr. View Post
I found this at ebay:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/LUGER-P08-BA...item35db10f1a0

It is the barrel - receiver - toggle assembly from a M2 Portuguese Luger.
The barrel bears serial number 3647 (with the circled triangle just below it). The receiver, however, does not match it.

Douglas.
I would not mind having that cannon assembly...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2014, 11:05 AM   #32
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
Interesting reading!

It's not clear within what context the combatants are referred to as 'Marine Battalion'...Did the Portuguese have an actual 'Marine Corps' similar to their British and American counterparts??? Or were 'soldiers' (or sailors assigned ground assault duty) embarked onboard ship simply referred to as 'Marine'??? Perhaps 'Maritime' might be more accurate???
It's a complicated history, but in 1914 Portugal didn't have an actual Marine Corps, as you said above they had sailors with infantry training who were assigned ground assault duty.

Portugal present Marine Corps (Corpo de Fuzileiros Navais) was created in 1961 but they trace their origins back to 1618, As I said complicated.

http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpo_de_Fuzileiros


Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepherder View Post
And what is a 'soliped'??? A horse???
Yes a horse. A rather elaborate way of saying it. The normal word is cavalo.


The funny part is... In 1914 Portugal was neutral, we had no part in the Europe battle ground. But was sort of at war with the Germans in Africa. It was only in 1916 that Portugal entered the war. The other funny part. When Portuguese troops went to France they were equiped with British Enfield rifles and .32 Savage pistols.

Last edited by kurusu; 08-26-2014 at 07:20 AM.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-22-2014, 05:17 PM   #33
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,181
Thanks: 1,398
Thanked 4,438 Times in 2,327 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kurusu View Post
It's a complicated history, but in 1914 we didn't have an actual Marine Corps, as you said above we had sailors with infantry training who were assigned ground assault duty.
I wasn't sure if you were of Portuguese descent or not, but it may interest you to know that the United States Navy has a 'Naval Infantry" detachment, or did back in 1971, when I was in the Marines. (I found it out by accident). I think all Navy ships now carry 'ground assault' trained sailors - "VBSS detachments", whether they have Marines on board or not.

I have a desire to one day visit Portugal, and probably some of Spain as well. I've already visited Germany.

The 2M Luger cannon on eBay interests me...But I can't decide if it is worth even the starting bid...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to sheepherder for your post:
Unread 08-23-2014, 10:46 AM   #34
LugerVern
User
 
LugerVern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 563
Thanks: 1
Thanked 34 Times in 27 Posts
Default

Thank you very much for the pictures!

Ok, holster guys & gals, how many of you would say that is the correct holster for Royal or RP navy? Looks a bit long in the muzzle to me?

Vern
LugerVern is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-23-2014, 02:31 PM   #35
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 6,986
Thanks: 1,065
Thanked 5,088 Times in 1,674 Posts
Default

I would say that they are M2 not navy Lugers. I know that some of the navy holsters with the attached shoulder strap were made for the 120mm barrel length (I have one) so I do believe that some portion of the 1908 M2 Lugers were transferred to the Navy for marine/ground assault units. Just my opinion, no documented evidence other than photos and holsters.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-25-2014, 09:33 AM   #36
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron Wood View Post
I would say that they are M2 not navy Lugers. I know that some of the navy holsters with the attached shoulder strap were made for the 120mm barrel length (I have one) so I do believe that some portion of the 1908 M2 Lugers were transferred to the Navy for marine/ground assault units. Just my opinion, no documented evidence other than photos and holsters.
That could very well be (the holsters in the pictures do indeed look too long for the navy lugers). But I fail to see the reason why they would equip themselves with army models in a different caliber than their own pistols. It would make sense for logistic reasons since they were operating with the army, but the rifles/carbines that can be seen in the hands of sailors are kropatscheks. The army was using the Mauser-Vergueiro by then. So ammunition compatibility doesn't seem to be the issue.

It's frustrating to say the least.

And I'm getting off my own topic.

And found another picture.

Click image for larger version

Name:	Oficiais batalhão da marinha.JPG
Views:	29
Size:	76.5 KB
ID:	43020

Last edited by kurusu; 08-27-2014 at 06:02 AM.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-27-2014, 08:44 AM   #37
kurusu
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 929 Times in 509 Posts
Default

There is a possible explanation for the serial numbers above 3500.

In a perfect world there would be 3500 pistols numbered 1 to 3500. But, a number of pistols would likely fail the production tests and others could even have been rejected on arrival, the circled triangle acceptance mark must mean something afterall , so in order to fullfill a 3500, contract the serial numbers may run higher than 3500, but there must be some gaps in between.

Off course I've not a shred of evidence to support this.

Last edited by kurusu; 08-27-2014 at 11:59 AM.
kurusu is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 10:17 AM   #38
Douglas Jr.
User
 
Douglas Jr.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: South America
Posts: 948
Thanks: 598
Thanked 584 Times in 254 Posts
Default

Dear Mario,

I have a friend in Italy who is writting an article about the Portuguese Lugers. He needs some help regarding vintage pictures and other info. I thought about put him in touch with you since you have been studying these variations.
If you agree, can you send me a message to jrdouglas@uol.com.br for further discussions?

________________________________________________________________________ ______________

EDIT - Found another one, serial number 3543 at cabellas:
http://www.cabelas.com/product/DWM-P...mm/1889836.uts


Saudações fraternas,

Douglas.
Douglas Jr. is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to Douglas Jr. for your post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com