my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
04-26-2003, 10:37 AM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
minor pitting
What is the balance between removing pitting and leaving the origional machining marks.
I have some pitting under the grips. If it's re-blued over the pits will it continue to corrode? |
04-26-2003, 10:52 AM | #2 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ca.
Posts: 2,141
Thanks: 8
Thanked 89 Times in 54 Posts
|
Yes, if you do not remove the rust 100% it will continue too corrode, and the rust can make a mess of it as you are hot bluing it...been there, done that...as too the machining marks and proofs marks that may be polished out or a least over, well that is why an original condition Luger vs. re-blue/re-worked Luger there is such a difference in price and desirability...judge what you have and its value against what you will have once its been re-worked. You were not specific it what you have and what condition it is in, and pictures always help, but do not rush into re-bluing what may be a nice collectable gun....hope this helps.
|
04-26-2003, 12:03 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 19
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Policeluger
Thanks for the advice. Can the rust in the pits be stabilized or removed chemicly without grinding them off? I have a 1939 S/42 which is relatively rare. It is in good mechanical condition but only has 5 to 10% of it's bluing left. It has a small area of pitting that's normally visable. I notice pitting under the edges of the grip also. The re-bluing is for my enjoyment. |
|
|